各家殺軟，主防測試(多圖)

a256886572008

原帖位置：
http://forum.safegroup.pl/viewtopic.php?f=67&t=4084

I'd like to present my first test of security software ProActiv.
I chose to test nine security programs which shut off the antivirus module for the test, they are;

1.NIS 2012 beta
2.KIS 2012 beta
3.Emsisoft AM
4.AVG IS 2011
5.Avast IS 6
6.Eset SS 5 beta
Premium 7.Comodo without anti-virus module
Premium 8.Avira
Personal 9.SysWatch

The programs I tested on 7.1.4 VMware virtual machine running Windows XP Home Edition SP3.

I used to test the package 25 the various sorts of malware, below screen




Test Result:

Avast IS 6













Result Avast IS 6 - FAIL, failed the test of Proactiv, the computer restarts, the system starts up, clean your computer processes, the infected computer's registry.

Avira Premium













Avira Premium Result - FAIL, did not pass the test of Proactiv, the computer restarts, the system starts up, the infected processes and registry on your computer.

AVG IS 2011





















Result AVG IS 2011 - FAIL, failed the test of Proactiv, the computer restarts, the system starts up, clean processes in the computer infection in rejetrze.

Emsisoft AM











Result Emsisoft AM - FAIL, failed the test of Proactiv, the computer restarts, the system starts up, infected and processes of logs on the computer.

Eset SS 5 beta























Result Eset SS 5 beta - FAIL, failed the test of Proactiv, the computer restarts, the system starts up, the infected processes and registry on your computer.

NIS 2012 beta









Result NIS 2012 beta - FAIL, failed the test of Proactiv, the computer restarts, the system starts up, the infected computer's registry and processes.

KIS 2012 beta













Result KIS 2012 beta - PASS, the test included, no reboots the computer, clean processes, and registry on your computer.  He put the files in the group nizaufanych, blocking all alerts, probably based on the detection signature files.

Personal SysWatch































Result SysWatch Personal - PASS, the test included, no reboots the computer, clean registry and processes komputera.Mocny blocker, which in restricted mode, mode, does not want to run virtually anything, and so should not be.

Comodo Firewall - Defense + for scanning in the cloud off, disconnected from the Internet







































Result Comodo Firewall - PASS, the test included, no reboots, no infection in the memory and the registry of your computer.

In conclusion - with 9 security programs, in the test ProActiv acquitted only 3 - Comodo, Kaspersky Personal and SysWatch, the other did not meet expectations.

Below I present you with charts and test Proactiv;

amount of displayed alerts those requested a decission from the user:


amount of threats founded by MBAM:


Thank you all for your patience, it will be a continuation of such tests, comments welcome.

Test Performed by andrzej76 - The head of the AV's tests - safegroup.pl

IOOOOI

前排支持！

c小超

图有点慢，不过很好的测试

jefffire

卡巴和comodo都具有HIPS模块，而且卡巴的HIPS是和特征码联动的，就算关闭监控也没用。诺顿的还把sonar关了，能再搞笑点不？

bukkake

俄国货就是好，syswatch就是以前的犀牛吧

bukkake

jefffire 发表于 2011-6-18 12:31
卡巴和comodo都具有HIPS模块，而且卡巴的HIPS是和特征码联动的，就算关闭监控也没用。诺顿的还把sonar关了， ...

诺顿可以关sonar不关av，但关av就必须关sonar

jason_jiang

居然连弹窗数也要比
这老外很搞笑

jefffire

bukkake 发表于 2011-6-18 12:44
诺顿可以关sonar不关av，但关av就必须关sonar

所以这种测试没什么意思，因为各家的机制差别，没法公平竞争。

bluelily

jefffire 发表于 2011-6-18 12:46
所以这种测试没什么意思，因为各家的机制差别，没法公平竞争。

铁壳还是略微特殊的     相信sonar效果不会太差

壮丁

我觉得只有卡巴2012与2011界面相差最大。