PC Pro进行的杀软评测 大腕挂了不少

卡住了

在卡巴英文官方看到的消息 还没进链接细看 就可想象卡巴成绩肯定不错 但吸引我的不是卡巴怎么怎么地好
而是其他杀软怎么怎么地"差"
  在PC Pro的评测中NOD32表现一般 给的总体评价是 An eccentric package that gives only average protection.  
（NOD32古怪的版本只能提供一般的保护）

With its middling antivirus performance and unprofessional user interface, NOD32 fails to impress - even though it's been around for a long time. At this price, it certainly can't compete
如此中等的表现加上非专业的用户界面，使得NOD32很难给人留下深刻印象，即使他的存在已经很久了。而且如此高的价格也不具备竞争力


给Panda的评价可能最狠 有兴趣的朋友可以去看看

http://www.pcpro.co.uk/labs/120453/eset-nod32.html

[ 本帖最后由 卡住了 于 2007-9-22 19:53 编辑 ]

风野胤

放心
eset官网要有测试
卡巴也是被骂。。。。。。。

ps 怎么不去测eset nod32.。。。。。。。。

[ 本帖最后由 风野胤 于 2007-9-22 19:48 编辑 ]

傻猪猪米走鸡

都说eset要改一下初始设置，那帮人老是不肯改……

秋叶濛濛

Upfront, Panda is a likeable package前期，熊猫是一个可爱的方案。 At just £14 per year for a two-user licence, it's among the most affordable of the commercial antivirus packages on test this month.仅14英镑，每年为期用户许可证，它的中，最实惠的商业防毒套测试本月。 In use, its user interface is admirably clean and responsive: we appreciated the quick, simple installation, the sensible "don't show this again" options on alerts, and low CPU usage during scanning.在使用，其用户界面是令人钦佩的清洁和反应：我们赞赏快速，简便的安装，合理" ，并没有显示这又"选项警报，低cpu使用率在扫描。

Unfortunately, such excellent early impressions didn't last long.不幸的是，这种优良的早期印象并不长久。 In our tests, Panda achieved the unenviable distinction of being the在我们的测试，熊猫达到值得羡慕区分被   
   
ADVERTISEMENT 广告  

only package to actually crash while scanning email, resulting in the majority of our infected emails reaching our inbox without ever being inspected.只有一揽子其实车祸而扫描电子邮件，导致我国大多数受感染的电子邮件达到我们的收件匣中从来没有被检查。 Panda's user forums and technical support team suggest this was a freak occurrence, although it afflicted us identically on both XP and Vista systems.熊猫软件公司的用户论坛和技术支持团队推荐这是一个畸形的发生，虽然我们遭受恒均xp和vista的系统。

To work around this problem, we re-imaged the system, copied our full range of malware onto the hard disk and ran a complete system scan.要紧紧围绕这个问题，我们重新影像系统，我们抄全套恶意转入硬盘和冉一个完整的系统扫描。 The results were barely more encouraging than the email test: Panda managed to identify just 60% of the threats on our system, giving the green light to executables including variants of the Hidrag virus, the Magistr Outlook virus and the Joiner trojan.结果，有1,861多鼓励比电子邮件测试：大熊猫设法找出只有60 ％的威胁，对我们的制度，让绿灯可执行包括变种的病毒hidrag ，展望win98病毒和细木工特洛伊木马程序。 This result put Panda Antivirus squarely in last place out of this month's 13 competitors.这一结果把熊猫防毒正视，在地方上出本月的13日竞争者。

It would have been nice to be able to recommend Panda as a friendly, affordable option but, ultimately, if an antivirus package doesn't detect viruses then the lowest price in the world can't make it good value.本来不错，可以推荐大熊猫作为友好的，负担得起的选择，但归根结底，如果一个杀毒软件包不查出病毒，然后以最低价格，在世界上不能使它很好的价值。  If you're on a tight budget, any of the free solutions will do a better job of protecting your system.如果你对预算吃紧，任何自由的解决方案将进一步做好保护你的系统。

欠妳緈諨

AVG和AVIRA的免费版评级都是五星,AVAST家庭版居然只有三星,最惨的是NOD32,居然是二星,我怀疑这些评委脑子进水了 [:22:] [:22:] [:22:]

[ 本帖最后由 欠你幸福 于 2007-9-22 22:09 编辑 ]

zhengjun0202

寒一个先，没啥话说了

woai_jolin

对这种评测 一直54

欠妳緈諨

微软的最惨,1星

star_xing

谨供参考 呵呵 评测很多啊。

The EQs

这是一个很有趣的“评测”