微软不鸟AVT: Microsoft Contests Anti-Virus Tests, Claims Security Essentials Is

寒山竹语

jefffire 发表于 2013-1-18 11:44
趋势6.0防护 舍不得退

他们国内压根不知道评测这事儿。估计国外重视一点。。。

zhczf

有些评测根本就不行啊，支持微软退出

jefffire

寒山竹语 发表于 2013-1-18 14:55
他们国内压根不知道评测这事儿。估计国外重视一点。。。

难道是AVT未经允许 偷偷测的？

寒山竹语

jefffire 发表于 2013-1-18 15:02
难道是AVT未经允许 偷偷测的？

测试的国外的版本。国内的一帮人，都不知道

jefffire

寒山竹语 发表于 2013-1-18 15:04
测试的国外的版本。国内的一帮人，都不知道

大公司部门隔阂深似海。国内权限太低，什么事都不知道。

jentle

英文水平太低，看不懂

寒山竹语

jefffire 发表于 2013-1-18 15:08
大公司部门隔阂深似海。国内权限太低，什么事都不知道。

算是正解

aesirsson

蓝核 发表于 2013-1-17 23:43
“For the remainder of the missed files, we used a retrospective analysis to see if any of our custo ...

看看官方怎麼說：

We continually evaluate and look at ways to improve our processes. We know from feedback from customers that industry testing is valuable, and their tests do help us improve. We're committed to reducing our 0.0033 percent margin to zero.

http://blogs.technet.com/b/mmpc/ ... t-test-results.aspx

感覺是樓主斷章取義了...

蓝核

aesirsson 发表于 2013-1-18 20:06
看看官方怎麼說：

应该不是……
看这里
http://www.ifanr.com/news/236906
这里是官方的博客原文http://blogs.technet.com/b/mmpc/ ... t-test-results.aspx
The antimalware world is challenging, for both antimalware companies protecting their customers and for independent testing organizations trying to determine the efficacy of antimalware products. We choose to meet that challenge by prioritizing our protection work based on prevalence and customer impact measures, as Dennis Batchelder discussed in his recent blog post on Customer-focused prioritization. It is also difficult for independent antimalware testing organizations to devise tests that are consistent with the real-world conditions that customers live in; AV-Test shared some of the difficulties and shortfalls in many of the independent industry tests in a presentation they gave at the AVAR (Association of Anti-Virus Asia Researchers) Security Conference in 2012. We agree with them, it is difficult to get the tests right.

他已经在否认独立的测试可能无法得出正确的测试结果

aesirsson

蓝核 发表于 2013-1-18 20:16
应该不是……
看这里
http://www.ifanr.com/news/236906

更精確的來說，這一段並沒有反駁AV-Test的測試，乃是說AV-Test曾公開說明評測的困難與短處，而微軟只是同意之：

AV-Test shared some of the difficulties and shortfalls in many of the independent industry tests in a presentation they gave at the AVAR (Association of Anti-Virus Asia Researchers) Security Conference in 2012. We agree with them, it is difficult to get the tests right.

從標題「Key lessons learned from the latest test results」就很清楚可以得知，微軟是提醒觀眾，要用正確的眼光來看這個評測，成績好壞不一定真正代表用戶在面對網路環境時的情形。

說到底，也是微軟想證明自己很有實力的一篇文章。