原帖地址http://betatest.avira.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=439
翻译开始：
此报告使用Shields UP (https://grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd2)比较了avira和ZoneAlarm防火墙。avira和ZoneAlarm均使用相同设置
测试结果
Avira Low Setting:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GRC Port Authority Report created on UTC: 2006-10-24 at 10:43:29
Results from scan of ports: 0-1055
2 Ports Open
1054 Ports Closed
0 Ports Stealth
---------------------
1056 Ports Tested
NO PORTS were found to be STEALTH.
Ports found to be OPEN were: 135, 445
Other than what is listed above, all ports are CLOSED.
TruStealth: FAILED - NOT all tested ports were STEALTH,
- NO unsolicited packets were received,
- A PING REPLY (ICMP Echo) WAS RECEIVED.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Avira Medium Setting:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GRC Port Authority Report created on UTC: 2006-10-24 at 10:41:02
Results from scan of ports: 0-1055
0 Ports Open
9 Ports Closed
1047 Ports Stealth
---------------------
1056 Ports Tested
NO PORTS were found to be OPEN.
Ports found to be CLOSED were: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Other than what is listed above, all ports are STEALTH.
TruStealth: FAILED - NOT all tested ports were STEALTH,
- NO unsolicited packets were received,
- A PING REPLY (ICMP Echo) WAS RECEIVED.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Zonealarm Medium Setting:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GRC Port Authority Report created on UTC: 2006-10-24 at 10:34:37
Results from scan of ports: 0-1055
0 Ports Open
1051 Ports Closed
5 Ports Stealth
---------------------
1056 Ports Tested
NO PORTS were found to be OPEN.
Ports found to be STEALTH were: 135, 137, 138, 139, 445
Other than what is listed above, all ports are CLOSED.
TruStealth: FAILED - NOT all tested ports were STEALTH,
- NO unsolicited packets were received,
- A PING REPLY (ICMP Echo) WAS RECEIVED.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Avira-High setting:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GRC Port Authority Report created on UTC: 2006-10-24 at 10:38:35
Results from scan of ports: 0-1055
0 Ports Open
0 Ports Closed
1056 Ports Stealth
---------------------
1056 Ports Tested
ALL PORTS tested were found to be: STEALTH.
TruStealth: PASSED - ALL tested ports were STEALTH,
- NO unsolicited packets were received,
- NO Ping reply (ICMP Echo) was received.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Zonealarm High setting:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GRC Port Authority Report created on UTC: 2006-10-24 at 10:30:44
Results from scan of ports: 0-1055
0 Ports Open
0 Ports Closed
1056 Ports Stealth
---------------------
1056 Ports Tested
ALL PORTS tested were found to be: STEALTH.
TruStealth: PASSED - ALL tested ports were STEALTH,
- NO unsolicited packets were received,
- NO Ping reply (ICMP Echo) was received.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
这项测试显示对于中/高设置，avira与Zonealarm工作机理可能有所不同。不同可能出在端口保护和其他工作环境。但重点是：在没有太多烦人的设置下，谁可以给新手最佳的保护？
通过测试，avira赢了Zonealarm，因为即使在中等设置下，avira可以隐藏多数端口。avira防火墙设置中不包括“关闭”，因为这可能被意外设置。除非你在状态面板中关闭。
并且，看起来ZA的中等设置在avira中是“低”
端口 65516-65535的扫描显示在ZA的中等设置中，所有端口被关闭但可见。avira的中等设置显示仅65516, 65517, 65518, 65519, 65520, 65521, 和65522被关闭，剩余的均被隐藏。avira的低设置仅仅关闭端口但不隐藏。
虽然avira的中等设置很好，但默认设置为高是，所有用户不用设置就能得到完全的保护
翻译结束
注：此项测试并非avira官方所做，且测试范围较小，不代表权威观点！ |
发表于 2007-11-10 11:51:32
发表于 2007-11-10 14:11:56
