關於 AV-Test Win8 Jan/Feb 2013 ，官方的說明

a256886572008

http://forums.comodo.com/news-announcements-feedback-cis/cis-certifications-test-results-reviews-t61263.0.html;msg676819#msg676819

AV-TEST Win8 Jan/Feb 2013：
http://www.av-test.org/en/tests/home-user/windows-8/janfeb-2013/

Let me Share with you the detailed results:

av-test tested CIS 6 for 2 months, January 2013 and February 2013.

Here are the results:

January 2013:

1. BLOCKING OF "REAL WORLD" ATTACKS
Completely blocked malware attacks: 47
Partially blocked malware attacks: 7
Attacks not blocked (system got infected): 2
Protection: 54/56 - 96%

2. DETECTION OF PREVALENT MALWARE (STATIC AND DYNAMIC) - Standard Settings :
Detection Rate: 7423/ 7426 - 99.96%
False Positives: 22/293897 - 0.0074%

February 2013:

1. BLOCKING OF "REAL WORLD" ATTACKS
Completely blocked malware attacks: 62
Partially blocked malware attacks: 7
Attacks not blocked (system got infected): 0
Protection: 69/69 - 100%
False Positives(Behavior Blocker alerts):5/70 7%

2. DETECTION OF PREVALENT MALWARE (STATIC AND DYNAMIC) - Standard Settings :
Detection Rate: 10839/ 10841- 99.98%
False Positives: 22/308887- 0.0071%

As you see CAV detection rate is 99.9%. False positive rate is pretty low.
The only thing i personally care is the fact that in January, there were 2 reported infections despite CIS and these are fixed.  

We are not allowed to disclose the others' results so hence cant compare with others too much. The main reason we look low on is false positive rate. Not the protection, not the usability you may think.

Let other vendors publish their own results and you guys compare and decide. When i interpret these results, i see a solid product within top 4 and in this top 4 CIS is the ONLY free one.

如果我猜得沒錯的話，那個 Partially blocked malware attacks，只是因為電腦上有病毒屍體，AV-TEST 就算穿破。

COMODO 官方說穿破是1月那兩隻，然後 6.1 build 2801 已修復。

p1020

终于出新版了

chinaallenchen

期待中

bbs2811125

成绩不错~