Evaluating AV tests

360Tencent

https://antimalwaretesting.wordp ... valuating-av-tests/

http://community.norton.com/t5/N ... ecurity/ba-p/943843

comments?

There can be value in certification tests. But before you even think of relying on a badge or award to judge the relative quality of one solution over another, dig a little deeper into its background and find out what exactly is required to earn that badge.

I was going to include links in here to some of the major test labs’ methodologies, but maybe it’s better to let you find them for yourselves – go to your favourite tester’s website, and dig out their description of how they do their tests and how they grant their awards. Or, just Google the lab name and the word ‘methodology’.

If you can’t find out the full details of how a test works, ask yourself, why not? What’s the big secret? Why should I just take it as read that this test is being done right?

If you do manage to find it, read it through. Does it tell you all you need to know? Do you come away from it with a clear idea of what is being tested, and how?

Most importantly in the case of certifications, does it clearly state what the baseline requirements are for earning the award?

If so, then you’re in luck - this basic understanding is the first step on the road to being able to properly follow and apply the results of a test, compare it with others, and perhaps even find out which really is the best product for your particular needs.

03011020044

支持一下

jefffire

这篇文章的大意是：别人说你数学不好 你回答我语文很好，说我数学不好的都没看到我语文好，所以都是误导

港岛妹妹

没啥好说的，av也不是很景气