从vb100%测试看红伞

LUKY

最新的vb100%测试结果出来了，红伞很荣幸的挂掉了。
Avira

Status: FAIL Failure reason: 4 false positives Result history: Avira Product name: Avira AntiVir Details: Only available to subscribers.

失败的原因是：4个误杀。

回顾红伞3年来参加vb100%的记录，如下：
VB100 Results Overview: Avira
10 Success / 2 Failure / 43 No Entry

Test historyDecember 2007 - Avira AntiVir Status: FAIL Failure reason: 4 false positives Product name: Avira AntiVir More: December 2007 in full Review: Avira AntiVir on Windows 2000 Details: Only available to subscribers. June 2007 - Avira AntiVir Status: PASS Product name: Avira AntiVir More: June 2007 in full Review: Avira AntiVir on Windows XP Details: Only available to subscribers. April 2007 - Avira AntiVir 2.1.9-37 Status: PASS Product name: Avira AntiVir 2.1.9-37 More: April 2007 in full Review: Avira AntiVir 2.1.9-37 on SUSE Linux Details: Only available to subscribers. December 2006 - Avira Antivir Windows Workstation v.7 Status: PASS Product name: Avira Antivir Windows Workstation v.7 More: December 2006 in full Review: Avira Antivir Windows Workstation v.7 on Windows XP x64 Edition Details: Only available to subscribers. October 2006 - Avira AntiVir Windows Server 2003/2000/NT v. 6.35 Status: FAIL Product name: Avira AntiVir Windows Server 2003/2000/NT v. 6.35 More: October 2006 in full Review: Avira AntiVir Windows Server 2003/2000/NT v. 6.35 on Windows 2000 Server Details: Only available to subscribers. June 2006 - Avira AntiVir Status: PASS Product name: Avira AntiVir More: June 2006 in full Review: Avira AntiVir on Windows XP Details: Only available to subscribers. April 2006 - Avira AntiVir 6.33.1.74 Status: PASS Product name: Avira AntiVir 6.33.1.74 More: April 2006 in full Review: Avira AntiVir 6.33.1.74 on Red Hat Linux 9 Details: Only available to subscribers. February 2006 - Avira Avira Desktop 1.00.00.80 Status: PASS Product name: Avira Avira Desktop 1.00.00.80 More: February 2006 in full Review: Avira Avira Desktop 1.00.00.80 on Windows NT 4.0 Workstation Details: Only available to subscribers. October 2005 - Avira Avira for Windows Server 1 Status: PASS Product name: Avira Avira for Windows Server 1 More: October 2005 in full Review: Avira Avira for Windows Server 1 on Windows Server 2003 Details: Only available to subscribers. June 2005 - Avira 1.00.00.64 Status: PASS Product name: Avira 1.00.00.64 More: June 2005 in full Review: Avira 1.00.00.64 on Windows XP Details: Only available to subscribers. April 2005 - Avira 1.1.3-17 Status: PASS Product name: Avira 1.1.3-17 More: April 2005 in full Details: Only available to subscribers. February 2005 - Avira 1.00.00.61 Status: PASS Product name: Avira 1.00.00.61 More: February 2005 in full Review: Avira 1.00.00.61 on Windows NT 4.0 Details: Only available to subscribers.

从上面的结果来看，红伞的表现的确是很抢眼，这次就先不说了，看看另外一次失败的评语吧：
Avira AntiVir Windows Server 2003/2000/NT v.6.35


Avira's product was one of the plethora I was trying for the first time, and it rather pleased me.
The installation process offered no difficulties, although an image of what seemed to be a man holding a red umbrella indoors gave me reason to wonder how lucky Avira would be. The GUI reassured me with its pared-down, vaguely techie feel, simple icon-style graphics and text-heavy displays and menus. The progress display, updating itself every 50–100 files scanned, gave an impression of thoroughness, and results in the first few tests were admirable.
A few of the new polymorphic viruses went unrecognised, but this was not too surprising. It was in the clean set that Avira's luck ran out, however, and with two false positives recorded, AntiVir misses out on its VB 100%.

vb100%给红伞的评价还是很高的，界面朴实，杀毒速度快。但是，因为2个误杀，与vb100失之交臂。

说这些，其实就像和伞友交流一下：

1、红伞的确很优秀，vb100的通过率能达到83%，很不错了。

2、红伞即使挂了，也虽败犹荣，从来都是几个误杀而已，那么大的病毒库才这么多，对我么一般用户来说，完全可以忽略不计，即使误杀了，我们也可以放到隔离区。不会影响使用。

3、不要迷信所谓的市场占有率很高的杀软，那些杀软很多都是炒作出来的。前段时间很流行的“熊猫烧香”，最牛的卡巴、瑞星……基本都是束手无策，然后等病毒发作了再想办法。而红伞，即使没有更新病毒库，直接干掉。

4、红伞很优秀，但不希望它汉化，毕竟什么东西汉化后都有些“水产”，【不喜欢e文的朋友别砸我，其实杀软就那几个单词，我也不是全能发准音，只是看看就认识了】

5、不管是专业的测试还是在病毒样本区，红伞的表现都很抢眼。这个我不多说，自己去试试，自己去看看。
下面是全世界最权威的两个病毒测试机构：
VB100%的官方网站：http://www.virusbtn.com/ 【要注册才能看】
AV-comparive的官方网站：http://www.av-comparatives.org/

6、误杀在一定的范围内，不一定是坏事，漏杀才是问题。就像一个能力很强的人，尽管做错了一件事情，但是没有什么不好的后果【隔离区】，总比一个什么事情都做不出来的好吧。

7、暂且谈这几点，有兴趣的朋友补充，没兴趣的不要发言。谢谢！

运指如飞

用软件从来不看什么测试，只看实际效果
本来杀软要的就是实际防御效果，而不是一堆数据和获得的荣誉

很同意楼主的观念，宁可误杀也不漏杀

Humhook

NOD 也过了   呵呵   不知道他们有多高兴  一个 VB100的 神话

milk860

同意楼主的观点，我就是光认识一个单词scan，还是当年研究某扫描工具的时候认识的这个单词，会这个单词就可以应付大多数e文杀软了

欠妳緈諨

没通过应该是4个误报，不是2个 ，AVIRA的策略在个人用户是不错，但在企业市场是没有前途的，看看赛门铁克就知道企业用户最需要的是什么 ，而如果不能在企业市场有所作为，AVIRA永远不可能成为真正的大牌杀软

这种测试其实过不过无所谓了，用着好就可以

zeeloo

同意LZ，有些软件还是不要中文版的好，比如REALPLAYER

mofunzone

还有人看vb100%这种广告测试？
考试前告诉各家要测试什么样本
而且只有蠕虫，连木马什么都没有。。
看他做什么，就算antivir不杀itw样本，我也完全没意见，反正很快就会补上

地之雾

楼主说得很好，一个杀软关键是看效果，而不是纸上谈兵。

chy2aesir

很多测试的获奖者不一样