本帖最后由 pizza 于 2015-5-3 00:07 编辑
七宝 发表于 2015-5-2 23:31
如果你想当复读机，请自便，但不要回复我，谢谢
因为我懒得看你那句丝毫没有逻辑关联的话
管家出现问题了是管家的事，与我有何关系呢？
目前只有奇虎360公关文指责腾讯在性能测试上存在动作，而个人认为应当以三大机构官方消息为准，而非听360一家之言，且是明显偏颇的言论，然后再就事论事。就事论事很难吗？
奇虎360的作弊行为，你却一直赖到所谓的“文宣”上，不觉得很丢脸么～
以下是奇虎360官方英文回复，可以对比下国内“版本”，尽管都是找借口，但截然不同的态度是不是很有意思：
April 30th, Qihoo 360 received comments from its industry partners with allegation of inappropriate behaviour on the benchmarking processes in test labs. We regret that this behaviour has resulted into such comments from these labs, who we recognize as reference for security benchmarking. However, we hereby offer our perspective to the alleged comments.
The allegation highlights that the default configuration of the product available for the public, differs from the configuration used by the labs for testing. This configuration was explicitly declared upon submission of the tests, and was thereafter confirmed by the test labs.
In the public version, 3rd party engine is off by default, in the consideration that the majority of our users, are running on lower computing power. To satisfy lab conditions, the consideration of power constraint was therefore discarded. In any case, no alleged comment indicates that the level of protection from the product, is lower than the records achieved during the testing sessions.
Qihoo is committed to provide free security solutions, in order to convert security a commodity for all PC users. In addition, our product offers multiple engines, and regardless of the initial configuration, it is the user who has the complete freedom to choose how many of them should be activated at any time. It is with such understanding that AV-Test, one of the three testing labs involved, has stated that further investigation is ongoing, and will provide further updates on this topic.
PS 奇虎360自己作弊，官方国内说法却赖到AV-C上。奇虎360作弊，你却赖到360“文宣”上。看起来都不怎么讲道理。 |
楼主: zsxflzt
[复制链接]
发表于 2015-5-2 23:38:39
发表于 2015-5-2 23:44:08
