Kaspersky or F-secure ? (dont answer, it's ended)

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2008-2-27 15:11:33

well, I mean I understand Chinese, it does not mean that I am capable for typing Chinese.

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2008-2-27 15:18:15

恕我愚昧，LZ这两句英文咋看起来这么生分呢～" that's haven't tried it yet"
"suggest me to use others"好像用法不对吧

如说错了请见谅，本人水平低

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2008-2-27 15:23:40

F-secure is not 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = AVP + Norman

F-seucre is 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = AVP + Norman + Ad-ware (at least adware)

Why? I am sure that F-seure has a better detection of spy-ware, right?
Plus, the rookit detection F-secure is at Symantec and Panda level which means it is way better than AVP.
If you dont believe me, check the AV-comparative Data in the end of year 2007.

AVP reaction speed is faster than FS
But FS rookit detection and false detection possibility is better than AVP
And AVP's new virus detection is better than FS (FS is 14%, AVP is 40%) Check the latest AV-comparative Data

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2008-2-27 15:34:06

AVP的新病毒检出率高于FS，那是因为AVP的引擎有启发，而卖给FS的引擎没有启发~！

不过FS的主防和norman的沙盘可以很好的弥补这个缺陷，事实上对于FS的认识不能仅仅停留在它的检出率上，很多样本在运行的时候都过不了FS的主防和沙盘的~！

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2008-2-27 15:53:20

你说FS低启发会不会是考虑到企业用户？为了低误报

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2008-2-27 15:55:54

原帖由 alextown 于 2008-2-27 15:18 发表
恕我愚昧，LZ这两句英文咋看起来这么生分呢～" that's haven't tried it yet"
"suggest me to use others"好像用法不对吧如说错了请见谅，本人水平低

这帖快成了英语教学帖了，俺就学了那么一句还学错了，汗。。。。

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2008-2-27 16:15:08

最近卡饭流行英语?!

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2008-2-27 17:34:39

中国人麻就说国语啦

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2008-2-27 17:39:39

原帖由 spaceplane 于 2008-2-27 15:53 发表
你说FS低启发会不会是考虑到企业用户？为了低误报

不知道~！不过FS区里有人做过测试，FSCS在样本区跑样本，运行后基本上没有漏的，都能被FS拦截~~~

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2008-2-27 20:03:51

What if FS has high detection of new virus like 50%?
it is definitely one of the perfect security software right?
low false detection possibilty
high known virus detection
multi-engine
high rookit detection
smart system control (norman sandbox)
high unknown virus / malware detection (not having yet

)

[求助] Kaspersky or F-secure ? (dont answer, it's ended)

回复 24楼 jpzy 的帖子