MRG Effitas 360 Assessment & Certification Q2 2017

petr0vic

Security Applications Tested
• avast! Internet Security 17.5.2302
• AVG Internet Security 17.5.3021
• Avira Internet Security 15.0.27.34
• BitDefender Internet Security 2017 21.0.25.92
• ESET Internet Security 10.1.210.0
• Kaspersky Internet Security 17.0.0.611
• Malwarebytes Anti-Malware 3.1.2.1733
• McAfee LiveSafe 16.0.1
• Microsoft Windows Defender 4.10.14393.0
• Microsoft Windows Defender 4.10.14393.0 + Smart Screen
• Panda Internet Security 17.0.1
• SurfRight HitmanPro 3.7.20- Build 286
• Symantec Norton Security 22.10.0.83
• ThreatTrack Vipre Advanced Security 10.1.3.3
• Trend Micro Maximum Security 11.1.1045
• Watchdog Anti-Malware 2.72.186.101
• Webroot SecureAnywhere 9.0.17.24
• Zemana Anti-Malware 2.74.2.76

Q2 2017 In the Wild 360 / Full Spectrum Test Results
The table below shows the initial detection rates of the security products. This table is sorted by smallest amount of failures.




The table below shows the initial detection rates of the security products for ransomware. This table is sorted by smallest amount of failures.



The table below shows the initial detection rates of the security products for financial malware. This table is sorted by smallest amount of failures



The table below shows the initial detection rates of the security products for Deceptors (PUA/Adware). This table is sorted by smallest amount of failures.
(Results of this test are not part of the certificate.)



Level 1 = All threats detected on first exposure or via behaviour protection or detected in 24 hours.
Kaspersky Internet Security

Level 2 = At least 98% of the threats detected and neutralised / system remediated before or on the first
rescan.

• avast! Internet Security
• Avira Internet Security
• AVG Internet Security
• BitDefender Internet Security
• ESET Smart Security
• SurfRight HitmanPro
  

Failed = Security product failed to detect all infections and remediate the system during the test
procedure.

• Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
• McAfee Internet Security
• Microsoft Windows Defender
• Microsoft Windows Defender with Smart Screen
• Panda Internet Security
• Symantec Norton Security
• ThreatTrack Vipre Internet Security
• Trend Micro Maximum
• Watchdog Anti-Malware
• Webroot SecureAnywhere
• Zemana Anti-Malware
  

https://www.mrg-effitas.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/MRG-Effitas-360-Assessment_2017_Q2_wm.pdf

PanzerVIIIMaus

卡巴、比特大厂流仍旧强而有力，咖啡WD继续搏杀
反流氓方面则是卡巴最孱弱，ESET强无敌是吧

dongwenqi

卡巴杀木马病毒，勒索很强项，但是对流氓软件还是不行

pal家族

最后一幅图很诚实

cloud01

ESET日常生活最实用，防漏洞也是顶级。AMS算部分主防，效果也不错，比行为防御更有前摄性。防火墙还能防ARP。。。良心。卡巴斯基我还是用在高端游戏台式机上，不卡，也不杀破解。 赛门铁克还是适合办公电脑。

tianzhena

cloud01 发表于 2017-8-25 11:42
ESET日常生活最实用，防漏洞也是顶级。AMS算部分主防，效果也不错，比行为防御更有前摄性。防火墙还能防ARP ...

装eset只为高级内存扫描

lx02611

这是什么测试啊

难以置信，现在的诺顿加入了机器学习，加上自身比卡巴更加激进的报毒策略，第一张居然auto block那么低

有没有了解的人能介绍一下MRG这个机构吗？貌似和好几个有名的测试机构（包括AVC）都有合作。说实话，他这个测试可比AVC那个常年100%，可读性高多了。。。

cloud01

tianzhena 发表于 2017-8-25 12:12
装eset只为高级内存扫描

我也是为这个 ，另辟蹊径的技术。

HEMM

哈哈哈~这个榜真有趣，好多差评啊，我稀饭！快多多批评它们。卡巴真素独领风骚啊，那都榜首，又是无懈可击惹，也就PUP能与之一战。
nod32也是够酷惹。
WD真挫！