[AV-C] Real-World Protection Test Feb-June 2018

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2018-7-13 20:35:07

本帖最后由 petr0vic 于 2018-7-14 02:55 编辑

	Blocked	User dependent	Compromised	Protection Rate [Blocked % + (User dependent % / 2)]	Cluster
F-Secure	1080	-	-	100%	1
Trend Micro	1080	-	-	100%	1
Bitdefender	1078	-	2	99.8%	1
Symantec	1075	5	-	99.8%	1
Avira	1077	-	3	99.7%	1
Kaspersky Lab	1077	-	3	99.7%	1
McAfee	1076	-	4	99.6%	1
Tencent	1075	-	5	99.5%	1
Avast	1074	-	6	99.4%	1
AVG	1074	-	6	99.4%	1
VIPRE	1072	-	8	99.3%	1

ESET	1070	-	10	99.1%	2
Microsoft	1059	20	1	99%	2
Emsisoft	1066	-	14	98.7%	2
Panda	1066	-	14	98.7%	2
K7	1065	2	13	98.7%	2

BullGuard	1058	-	22	98%	3
Quick Heal	1041	20	19	97.3%	3

https://www.av-comparatives.org/ ... february-june-2018/

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2018-7-13 20:51:08

分式比BD还高

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2018-7-13 21:05:50

一楼的表格数据是二月到六月的总和

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2018-7-13 21:35:14

高误报带来高查杀

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2018-7-13 22:03:39

BD没误报我不信……

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2018-7-13 22:20:10

原来，还有很多软件和我一样，还活着~

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2018-7-14 00:32:29

本帖最后由 Eset小粉絲于 2018-7-14 00:40 编辑

Kindly change the title of this post with "[AV-C] Real-World Protection Test February - June 2018" to avoid misunderstanding.

I noticed that your chart was June result only but the result of February - June has been released so maybe you can upload the following information and the chart together with this post.

By Vendor

By Value

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2018-7-14 12:23:33

话说 Norton 的 User dependent 是什么样子的？感觉没见过

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2018-7-14 21:38:33

panda进步了啊，咖啡的RP也稳步提升

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2018-7-15 04:36:38

卡巴这个Compromised还是看得有些不舒服，官方并没有给这个Compromised的细分，是安软直接被干掉了或是系统被破坏了，还是和谐共存但被窃取了信息，还是说是ransome加密了无法恢复，个人觉得这还是有些区别的。简单来说，就是没显示出安软的自保能力和事后补救的能力。

https://www.av-comparatives.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/avc_rpt_2018a_fp_prevalence.png
把FS，Trend micro，Symantec黑的无声无息，一目了然

[杀软评测] [AV-C] Real-World Protection Test Feb-June 2018

评分

评分