3月AV-TEST测试结果

紫天

Overall results

Product	malware on demand	adware / spyware on demand	false positives ［误报］	scan speed ［扫描速度］	proactive detection ［主动检测］	response times ［反应时间］	rootkit detection	cleaning ［清除能力］
AntiVir (Avira)	++	++ (*1)	+	++	+	++	+	+
Avast! (Alwil)	++	+	+	+	o	+	o	o
AVG	+	++ (*1)	+	+	o	o	+	o
AVK (G Data)	++	++	o	--	+	++	--	-
BitDefender	+	++	o	-	++	+	+	o
ClamAV	--	--	-	--	-	++	--	--
Dr Web	o	o	o	o	+	o	+	+
eScan	+	o	o	-	+	++	--	--
eTrust / VET (CA)	--	--	++	o	-	--	+	++
Fortinet-GW	o	o	--	+	++	+	n/a (*2)	n/a (*2)
F-Prot (Frisk)	+	o	+	+	-	o	o	o
F-Secure	+	o	+	o	++	+	++	+
Ikarus	++	++	o	+	+	+	o	o
K7 Computing	--	--	o	-	-	-	--	--
Kaspersky	+	o	o	-	+	++	+	+
McAfee	+	++	++	o	+	o	+	++
Microsoft	+	o	++	o	-	--	o	++
Nod32 (Eset)	+	+	++	++	++	+	+	+
Norman	o	o	+	-	+	o	o	o
Norton (Symantec)	+	++	++	++	+	o	++	++
Panda	+	+	+	+	++	o	++	o
QuickHeal (CAT)	-	-	o	o	o	o	-	o
Rising	o	+	+	o	o	o	o	+
Sophos	++	++	+	+	++	+	+	+
Trend Micro	++	+	+	+	+	+	++	+
TrustPort	++	++	-	--	++	++	--	--
VBA32	-	o	o	o	+	o	o	+
VirusBuster	--	--	+	o	-	o	o	+
WebWasher-GW	++	++	o	++	++	++	n/a (*2)	n/a (*2)
ZoneAlarm	+	o	o	-	+	++	+	o
Index
++ = very good ［很好］	> 98%	> 98%	no FP			< 2 h
+ = good ［好］	> 95%	> 95%	1 FP			2 - 4 h
o = satisfactory ［满意］	> 90%	> 90%	2 FP			4 - 6 h
- = poor ［差］	> 85%	> 85%	3 FP			6 - 8 h
-- = very poor ［很差］	< 85%	< 85%	> 3 FP			> 8 h

Notes
(1) the free (personal) edition does not include ad- and spyware detection, so the results would be "--"
［免费的版本不包含ad-和spyware的检测，所以结果可能是“--”］

(2) not available (this is a gateway product)
［不可用］

Detection rates for malware, adware and spyware

Product	Malware samples	Adware and Spyware
AntiVir (Avira)	99.3%	99.1%
Avast! (Alwil)	98.8%	97.9%
AVG	96.3%	98.6%
AVK (G Data)	99.9%	99.9%
BitDefender	97.8%	98.8%
ClamAV	84.8%	82.4%
Dr Web	90.4%	92.8%
eScan	96.7%	92.1%
eTrust / VET (CA)	72.1%	56.5%
Fortinet-GW	92.4%	91.2%
F-Prot (Frisk)	96.7%	92.0%
F-Secure	96.8%	93.5%
Ikarus	98.0%	98.8%
K7 Computing	65.5%	59.5%
Kaspersky	97.2%	92.0%
McAfee	95.6%	98.6%
Microsoft	97.8%	91.5%
Nod32 (Eset)	97.8%	96.3%
Norman	92.8%	91.9%
Norton (Symantec)	95.7%	98.6%
Panda	95.6%	95.6%
QuickHeal (CAT)	85.7%	86.7%
Rising	94.1%	95.9%
Sophos	98.1%	98.8%
Trend Micro	98.7%	95.1%
TrustPort	99.6%	99.8%
VBA32	89.9%	92.1%
VirusBuster	76.2%	77.8%
WebWasher-GW	99.9%	99.9%
ZoneAlarm	96.4%	94.5%
Number of samples［样本数量］	1130556	83054

[ 本帖最后由 紫天 于 2008-3-31 10:51 编辑 ]

紫天

整理后的

	Product	Malware samples	Product	Adware and Spyware
1	AVK	99.9%	AVK	99.9%
2	WebWasher-GW	99.9%	WebWasher-GW	99.9%
3	TrustPort	99.6%	TrustPort	99.8%
4	AntiVir	99.3%	AntiVir	99.1%
5	Sophos	98.8%	Avast!	98.8%
6	Ikarus	98.7%	Trend Micro	98.8%
7	BitDefender	98.1%	Sophos	98.8%
8	AVG	98.0%	Ikarus	98.6%
9	Norton	97.8%	BitDefender	98.6%
10	McAfee	97.8%	Microsoft	98.6%
11	Avast!	97.8%	Nod32	97.9%
12	Nod32	97.2%	Kaspersky	96.3%
13	Rising	96.8%	F-Secure	95.9%
14	Panda	96.7%	eScan	95.6%
15	Trend Micro	96.7%	F-Prot	95.1%
16	ZoneAlarm	96.4%	ZoneAlarm	94.5%
17	F-Secure	96.3%	AVG	93.5%
18	Dr Web	95.7%	Norton	92.8%
19	eScan	95.6%	McAfee	92.1%
20	VBA32	95.6%	Panda	92.1%
21	Kaspersky	94.1%	Rising	92.0%
22	F-Prot	92.8%	Norman	92.0%
23	Norman	92.4%	Fortinet-GW	91.9%
24	Microsoft	90.4%	Dr Web	91.5%
25	Fortinet-GW	92.1%	VBA32	91.2%
26	QuickHeal	85.7%	QuickHeal	86.7%
27	ClamAV	84.8%	ClamAV	82.4%
28	VirusBuster	76.2%	VirusBuster	77.8%
29	K7 Computing	72.1%	eTrust	59.5%
30	eTrust	65.5%	K7 Computing	56.5%

[ 本帖最后由 紫天 于 2008-3-31 13:00 编辑 ]

嘁。不稀罕~

华丽的趋势，郁闷的CA!我喜欢的2个杀软。。。

aeonhuang

AVK多引擎冠军，红伞单引擎冠军
这两个都是我喜欢的
结合资源占用，启发，监控等方面去考虑，红伞第一当仁不让

紫天

AVK虽然查杀率很高，但是误报（0），扫描速度（--），

ronliang

这个结果。。我不说他啥了。。。

1688388728

路过

Heartstrings

呵呵。。。速度好快啊

dfangrong

红伞还是不错的哦

mofunzone

你adware和malware两列的数据正好反过来了。。
害得我以为瑞星杀病毒比卡巴还厉害了。。