大蜘蛛历次VB100测试成绩---致敬篇

kkk032

永远的DRweb
VB100 Results Overview: Doctor Web

由于主题帖字数长度限制，只好使用代码模式发帖。大家如果不相信大蜘蛛的成绩（25次成功，25次失败，8次未参加）
可以到这里访问原始数据：http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/archive/results?vendor=VE5  
   

25 Success / 25 Failure / 8 No Entry

Test history

June 2008 - Doctor Web Dr.Web

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 16 wildlist misses, 3 false positives
Product name: Doctor Web Dr.Web
More: June 2008 in full
Review: Doctor Web Dr.Web on Ubuntu Linux Server Edition
Details: Only available to subscribers.


April 2008 - Doctor Web Dr.Web

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 47 wildlist misses
Product name: Doctor Web Dr.Web
More: April 2008 in full
Review: Doctor Web Dr.Web on Windows Vista SP1 Business Edition
Details: Only available to subscribers.


February 2008 - Doctor Web Dr. Web Antivirus for Windows Server

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 4 wildlist misses
Product name: Doctor Web Dr. Web Antivirus for Windows Server
More: February 2008 in full
Review: Doctor Web Dr. Web Antivirus for Windows Server on Windows Server 2003
Details: Only available to subscribers.


December 2007 - Doctor Web Dr. Web

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 11 wildlist misses, 2 false positives
Product name: Doctor Web Dr. Web
More: December 2007 in full
Review: Doctor Web Dr. Web on Windows 2000
Details: Only available to subscribers.


October 2007 - Dr. Web Dr. Web

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 10 wildlist misses, 4 false positives
Product name: Dr. Web Dr. Web
More: October 2007 in full
Review: Dr. Web Dr. Web on Netware 6.5
Details: Only available to subscribers.


June 2007 - Doctor Web Dr.Web 4.33.3.04230

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 6 wildlist misses
Product name: Doctor Web Dr.Web 4.33.3.04230
More: June 2007 in full
Review: Doctor Web Dr.Web 4.33.3.04230 on Windows XP
Details: Only available to subscribers.


April 2007 - Doctor Web Dr.Web 4.33

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 3 wildlist misses
Product name: Doctor Web Dr.Web 4.33
More: April 2007 in full
Review: Doctor Web Dr.Web 4.33 on SUSE Linux
Details: Only available to subscribers.


October 2006 - Doctor Web Dr.Web v.4.33.2

Status: PASS
Product name: Doctor Web Dr.Web v.4.33.2
More: October 2006 in full
Review: Doctor Web Dr.Web v.4.33.2 on Windows 2000 Server
Details: Only available to subscribers.


August 2006 - Doctor Web Dr.Web 4.33.3

Status: FAIL
Product name: Doctor Web Dr.Web 4.33.3
More: August 2006 in full
Review: Doctor Web Dr.Web 4.33.3 on Netware 6.5
Details: Only available to subscribers.


June 2006 - Doctor Web Dr.Web

Status: PASS
Product name: Doctor Web Dr.Web
More: June 2006 in full
Review: Doctor Web Dr.Web on Windows XP
Details: Only available to subscribers.


April 2006 - Doctor Web Dr.Web 4.33.0.09211

Status: PASS
Product name: Doctor Web Dr.Web 4.33.0.09211
More: April 2006 in full
Review: Doctor Web Dr.Web 4.33.0.09211 on Red Hat Linux 9
Details: Only available to subscribers.


February 2006 - Dr.Web Dr.Web Scanner 4.33

Status: PASS
Product name: Dr.Web Dr.Web Scanner 4.33
More: February 2006 in full
Review: Dr.Web Dr.Web Scanner 4.33 on Windows NT 4.0 Workstation
Details: Only available to subscribers.


October 2005 - Dr.Web Dr.Web 4.33.0.08190

Status: PASS
Product name: Dr.Web Dr.Web 4.33.0.08190
More: October 2005 in full
Review: Dr.Web Dr.Web 4.33.0.08190 on Windows Server 2003
Details: Only available to subscribers.


August 2005 - Doctor Web Dr.Web 4.32c (4.32.3.06300)

Status: PASS
Product name: Doctor Web Dr.Web 4.32c (4.32.3.06300)
More: August 2005 in full
Review: Doctor Web Dr.Web 4.32c (4.32.3.06300) on Netware 6.5
Details: Only available to subscribers.


June 2005 - Doctor Web Dr.Web 4.32b

Status: PASS
Product name: Doctor Web Dr.Web 4.32b
More: June 2005 in full
Review: Doctor Web Dr.Web 4.32b on Windows XP
Details: Only available to subscribers.


April 2005 - Doctor Web Dr.Web for Linux 4.32.2

Status: PASS
Product name: Doctor Web Dr.Web for Linux 4.32.2
More: April 2005 in full
Details: Only available to subscribers.


February 2005 - Doctor Web Dr.Web 4.32b

Status: PASS
Product name: Doctor Web Dr.Web 4.32b
More: February 2005 in full
Review: Doctor Web Dr.Web 4.32b on Windows NT 4.0
Details: Only available to subscribers.


November 2004 - Doctor Web Dr.Web 4.32b

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 2 wildlist misses
Product name: Doctor Web Dr.Web 4.32b
More: November 2004 in full
Details: Only available to subscribers.


August 2004 - DialogueScience Dr.Web 4.31c

Status: PASS
Product name: DialogueScience Dr.Web 4.31c
More: August 2004 in full
Details: Only available to subscribers.


June 2004 - DialogueScience Dr.Web 4.31b

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist miss
Product name: DialogueScience Dr.Web 4.31b
More: June 2004 in full
Details: Only available to subscribers.


April 2004 - name: DialogueScience Dr.Web 4.31.1

Status: PASS
Product name: name: DialogueScience Dr.Web 4.31.1
More: April 2004 in full
Details: Only available to subscribers.


February 2004 - DialogueScience Dr.Web 4.30a

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist miss
Product name: DialogueScience Dr.Web 4.30a
More: February 2004 in full
Details: Only available to subscribers.


November 2003 - DialogueScience Dr.Web 4.30

Status: PASS
Product name: DialogueScience Dr.Web 4.30
More: November 2003 in full


August 2003 - DialogueScience Dr.Web 4.29c

Status: PASS
Product name: DialogueScience Dr.Web 4.29c
More: August 2003 in full


June 2003 - DialogueScience Dr.Web for Windows 95-XP 4.29c

Status: FAIL
Product name: DialogueScience Dr.Web for Windows 95-XP 4.29c
More: June 2003 in full


May 2003 - DialogueScience Dr.Web for Linux v4.29.7

Status: FAIL
Product name: DialogueScience Dr.Web for Linux v4.29.7
More: May 2003 in full


February 2003 - DialogueScience DrWeb for Windows 95-XP v4.29b

Status: PASS
Product name: DialogueScience DrWeb for Windows 95-XP v4.29b
More: February 2003 in full


November 2002 - DialogueScience DrWeb for Windows 95-XP v4.28c

Status: PASS
Product name: DialogueScience DrWeb for Windows 95-XP v4.28c
More: November 2002 in full


August 2002 - DialogueScience DrWeb v4.28

Status: PASS
Product name: DialogueScience DrWeb v4.28
More: August 2002 in full


June 2002 - DialogueScience DrWeb v4.28

Status: PASS
Product name: DialogueScience DrWeb v4.28
More: June 2002 in full


April 2002 - DialogueScience DrWeb v4.27a

Status: FAIL
Product name: DialogueScience DrWeb v4.27a
More: April 2002 in full


February 2002 - DialogueScience DrWeb v4.27

Status: PASS
Product name: DialogueScience DrWeb v4.27
More: February 2002 in full


November 2001 - DialogueScience DrWeb v4.26

Status: PASS
Product name: DialogueScience DrWeb v4.26
More: November 2001 in full


September 2001 - DialogueScience DrWeb v4.25

Status: PASS
Product name: DialogueScience DrWeb v4.25
More: September 2001 in full


April 2001 - DialogueScience DrWeb v4.23

Status: FAIL
Product name: DialogueScience DrWeb v4.23
More: April 2001 in full


February 2001 - DialogueScience DrWeb v4.22

Status: PASS
Product name: DialogueScience DrWeb v4.22
More: February 2001 in full


November 2000 - DialogueScience DrWeb v4.21

Status: FAIL
Product name: DialogueScience DrWeb v4.21
More: November 2000 in full


September 2000 - DialogueScience DrWeb v4.20

Status: PASS
Product name: DialogueScience DrWeb v4.20
More: September 2000 in full


July 2000 - DialogueScience DrWeb v4.17 (26/04/2000)

Status: FAIL
Product name: DialogueScience DrWeb v4.17 (26/04/2000)
More: July 2000 in full


April 2000 - DialogueScience DrWeb v4.16 (31/01/2000)

Status: FAIL
Product name: DialogueScience DrWeb v4.16 (31/01/2000)
More: April 2000 in full


February 2000 - DialogueScience DrWeb v4.14

Status: PASS
Product name: DialogueScience DrWeb v4.14
More: February 2000 in full


November 1999 - DialogueScience DrWeb 32 v4.12a

Status: PASS
Product name: DialogueScience DrWeb 32 v4.12a
More: November 1999 in full


September 1999 - DialogueScience DrWeb32 v4.11 (2/7/99)

Status: FAIL
Product name: DialogueScience DrWeb32 v4.11 (2/7/99)
More: September 1999 in full


July 1999 - DialogueScience DrWeb v4.06

Status: FAIL
Product name: DialogueScience DrWeb v4.06
More: July 1999 in full


May 1999 - DialogueScience DrWeb 32 v4.04 (beta)

Status: PASS
Product name: DialogueScience DrWeb 32 v4.04 (beta)
More: May 1999 in full


March 1999 - DialogueScience DrWeb32 v4.03aß

Status: FAIL
Product name: DialogueScience DrWeb32 v4.03aß
More: March 1999 in full


January 1999 - DialogueScience Dr Web v4.03 23 Oct 1998

Status: FAIL
Product name: DialogueScience Dr Web v4.03 23 Oct 1998
More: January 1999 in full


November 1998 - DialogueScience Dr Web for Win32 v4.02b

Status: FAIL
Product name: DialogueScience Dr Web for Win32 v4.02b
More: November 1998 in full


September 1998 - DialogueScience Dr Web v4.01ß

Status: FAIL
Product name: DialogueScience Dr Web v4.01ß
More: September 1998 in full


February 1998 - DialogueScience Dr Web v3.26 28 Oct 1997

Status: FAIL
Product name: DialogueScience Dr Web v3.26 28 Oct 1997
More: February 1998 in full


Vendor website
http://www.drweb.com

Product reviews

DialogueScience DrWeb v4.22 (PDF; March 2001)
DialogueScience AntiVirus Kit v3.0 (PDF; June 1999)
Dr Web (PDF; March 1996)
永远的DRweb

tulei

大蜘蛛的姿态太高了，曲高和寡啊！

邀请

？？坚持原则？

chenchen0427

是说大蜘蛛成绩好啊 还是说大蜘蛛不在乎vb呀  不太明白


有一点我得提醒一下  按vb的原则50%的通过率并不是很出色   bs vb100的可以无视

[ 本帖最后由 chenchen0427 于 2008-8-24 22:24 编辑 ]

Mr.Z

Doctor Web: statement on Virus Bulletin comparative reviews

August 8, 2008

Given recent announcements in mass media and numerous questions directed to our partners concerning our decision to abandon the comparative review of anti-virus products by Virus Bulletin we consider it necessary to issue our official statement on this subject.

Virus Bulletin is one of the most respected titles devoted to prevention, detection and removal of malware and spam naturally knitting virtually all anti-virus developers; annual anti-virus conferences held by the magazine still remain a unique event where competitiveness on the market loses its significance as vendors focus on pointing out new trends in the evolution of malware and work out methods to protect users all over the world.

The comparative reviews of anti-viruses conducted by Virus Bulletin every two months is an established event, almost a ritual. Dr.Web is one of the oldest participants with the successful history dating back to the second test in 1998. The testing always stood out among others of its kind for its transparent methods, accuracy and unbiased assessment of products of all vendors and perfect communication with anti-virus companies.

However developments of the industry in last years make many vendors question the comparative reviews. Though transparent and accurate the testing methods fail to keep up with the evolution of malware as well as anti-virus applications. That's why the long prestigious VB100% can no longer serve as a benchmark reflecting the actual quality of an anti-virus and which is worse is nowadays used to manipulate opinion of users.

Doctor Web sees the issues of the comparative testing as follows:

   1. Testing of an anti-virus for VB100% is based on In-the-Wild set of viruses which includes only malware capable of replicating itself which surely narrows the list of malicious programs used for the testing. As estimated by Doctor Web the In-the-Wild collection includes only 10 per cent of the total number of malware modern anti-viruses protect against.
   2. The above-mentioned criterion applied to In-the-Wild collection leaves out the large segment of the present-day malware – Trojans. The same applies to one of the gravest IT security issues of last 4-5 years, so called rootkits. No matter how good an anti-virus is at detecting Trojans which outnumber viruses manifold, mo matter what are its rootkit counteraction capabilities it will only get the VB100% upon a successful detection of several thousands of samples from the In-the-Wild collection. Alas, VB100% used as an ultimate benchmark by some marketing specialists and industry experts won't show a user if an anti-virus is really efficient against Trojans.
   3. In order to address new challenges Dr.Web is developing as all other AV products. AV vendors have to deal with new technologies of virus-writers on daily basis which makes constant bringing of innovations into an anti-virus a must. And here regular updates of a virus database are not enough. The testing for VB100% doesn't compare technical innovations of anti-viruses developed to counteract malicious programs that are never included the In-the-Wild collection.
   4. It's not a routine scan of a collection of files that shows how good an anti-virus is. It is a malicious attack when malware is attempting to get to a computer or a computer has already been infected. Recent years saw numerous proposals to create tougher conditions for testing anti-viruses and assess them by their ability to cope with an active infection. An anti-virus can show astounding results detecting samples from In-the-Wild collection but users will never know if it is the same perfect when malware is running in the RAM and controls the system rather than stored on a hard drive. Neither the test compares curing capabilities of anti-virus products.

Doctor Web considers these issues to have negative impact on the efficiency of the comparative reviews conducted by Virus Bulletin using existing testing methods. Results of the reviews don't provide any reasonable assessment of the quality of products in question, of their capability to protect users against contemporary threats. The procedure is called the comparative review but in fact the testing by Virus Bulletin doesn't compare many features implemented in present-day anti-viruses. Under the circumstances VB100% presented as a high-quality mark awarded to a successful participant in truth is merely an evidence of passing a certain test that doesn't have much to do with trying out capabilities of the software that are really relevant for counteracting contemporary malware threats.

All these issues have led Doctor Web to stepping aside as a participant of the Virus Bulletin comparative reviews. However, we are watching over the evolution of testing methods very closely and are sure to rejoin as soon as they are up to the present day requirements for anti-virus security.

http://info.drweb.com/show/3489/en

嘁。不稀罕~

又不是大蜘蛛厂商倒闭了，也不是卡饭封杀大蜘蛛的讨论，干嘛做的像生平回顾一样。。。

novahy

看到使用的字眼
让我想起了  缅怀     2 个字

ApolloCc

为啥我装了蜘蛛之后，一运行就自动关机呢
超级郁闷中~

kevin9718

蜘蛛想走熊猫路线？

guo2001

貌似测试数据不是很强悍啊