又是新测试 VirusInfo Testing: September and October 2008

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2008-11-17 02:32:31

In September and October, 2008 the leader of the testing is SecureWeb-Gateway due to its good signature detection combined with heuristics and packers detection. The second and third places belong to AntiVir and F-Secure accordingly. The worst product in September and October was TheHacker.

The best percent of each method in the whole detection rate: signature method - Avast; heuristics - NOD32; suspicious - eSafe, packers / cryptors - SecureWeb-Gateway.

Comments on how we test and how to understand the results

The material for testing is collected irregularly and voluntarily. VirusInfo publishes a new graph each month. The testing cannot be regarded as the one which completely reflects the detection abilities of anti-virus software, at the same time the data received are of certain value when comparing antiviruses in a complex way, taking into consideration the results of several independent tests.

Additional info

Materials for testing are collected in the special Russian section "Testing" of VirusInfo forum. In that section the forum members can access the earlier graphs. You may discuss the results of testing in English here.

Licensing

Copyright (c) VirusInfo.
All rights reserved.
Using the materials of this article without mentioning the source is prohibited.

Statistics is collected and processed by Shu_b

多谢jiahsuan的图

[ 本帖最后由 lanvin 于 2008-11-17 04:19 编辑 ]

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2008-11-17 02:58:31

所以说微软差的别再人云亦云了~这成绩打死一堆大牌杀软

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2008-11-17 03:12:51

你的圖表是錯的，因為你查看英文版面，10月的圖無法顯示的關係，你抓得是八月的圖表~
我在俄文版面找到正確的圖表：

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2008-11-17 03:24:38

以下排名以个人版为主，排除企业版：
1.AVIRA；F-SECURE
2.AVAST；AVG；GDATA
3.KASPERSKY
4.IKARUS
5.MICROSOFT；SOPHOS
6.MCAFEE
7.DR.WEB
8.BITDEFENDER
9.TRENDMICRO；VBA32；NOD32；F-PROT
它们的样本，跟国内的样本差很多，跟论坛上测试有很大差异

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2008-11-17 03:25:31

原帖由 jiahsuan 于 2008-11-17 02:58 发表
所以说微软差的别再人云亦云了~这成绩打死一堆大牌杀软

virusinfo的测试也只是参考罢了，没啥权威性可言，因为样本和测试都是基于VT的，他们不会分析VT上面的样本，所以里面会有大量的干净/损坏样本，再加上VT上面有不少厂商的设置也不同

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showpost.php?p=1349124&postcount=7

[ 本帖最后由 EQ2 于 2008-11-17 03:29 编辑 ]

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2008-11-17 04:03:53

没啥公信力。。。还不入看KAFAN的每天测试，好歹病毒来源是自己周围的网络环境

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2008-11-17 04:05:48

那个站台的性质跟这里差不多，都是非营利的客观测试~
差只差在它的样本区域性跟这边差异很大

别人觉得卡饭的测试没公信力吗?或许是，但也是有很好的参考价值

[ 本帖最后由 jiahsuan 于 2008-11-17 04:09 编辑 ]

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2008-11-17 04:30:41

谢谢jiahsuan的图
这个测试貌似因为样本的关系出了点问题
好像eset的官网炮轰过用VT样本做测试
看来又重新出发了

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2008-11-17 04:46:09

病毒木马都有地域性的。。。平时几个安全论坛的样本区转转，大致就能知道哪个软件适合自己使用了。。。

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2008-11-17 09:05:44

可以参考看看，谁的适应能力强

[资讯] 又是新测试 VirusInfo Testing: September and October 2008

本帖子中包含更多资源

本帖子中包含更多资源