小红伞的前身--小蓝伞[伞饭首发]
大家现在都说小红伞小红伞
偶尔出现个**绿伞 但是你知道小红伞在当年....
居然发行过小蓝伞吗?
今天偶然搜索发现这张图片,于是来了兴趣.
网络上现在几乎搜不到了...
下面看到的是当年的红伞个人版6.32
当年的包装:
当年产品LOGO:
当年产品界面:
AntiVir Personal Edition 6.32
这是第六版的antivir
评价......不是太好
虽然说是免费，并对各种病毒有90 ％的侦测率
但启发只报低于25 ％ ，还用一个月前的病毒码,当时免费版本都延时一个月更新病毒库
我也从VB100找了一些查杀的资料
其实不差，第六版有一次没过
现在是第九版了，有很大的进步 红伞早不是当年的小蓝伞了.
本文只是一时好奇搜索而写,争论请止,纯属娱乐.
其实标题应该写成:当年的小红伞身裹蓝袍!!!
当年的产品简介:
Of the three free antivirus programs we tested for "The New Virus Fighters" AntiVir's Personal Edition Classic 6.32 performed the best and got the best overall rating. But when compared with the whole set of paid and unpaid programs, what you get is pretty average.
AntiVir provides a clean user interface that's easy to use although visually rather plain. It also lacks some key features included in most of the other nine products we tested for "The New Virus Fighters" such as the ability to scan incoming and outbound e-mail for infected file attachments and the ability to quarantine infected files. AntiVir also lacks telephone technical support, as do all the free antivirus applications we tested.
Among the ten products in the test group, AntiVir ranked below average when conducting an on-demand scan, although it performed the best of the free programs. While able to detect more than 90 percent of the threats in our collection of backdoor programs, bots, and Trojan horses, it ranked near the bottom of the pack when it came to detecting unknown threats by using heuristics, catching less than 25 percent of worms and backdoors using one-month-old virus data. AntiVir did perform fairly well in our scan-speed tests, finishing fourth overall.
Missing features, middling performance, and the lack of telephone tech support put AntiVir in seventh place overall . However, the new AntiVir Personal Edition Classic 7, currently in beta, offers a new user interface and a new heuristics engine.
Upshot: AntiVir's free protection is better than no protection at all, though the program's performance and feature set could be better.
Tony Bradley
GG翻译如下:
三个免费的防病毒程序，我们测试“的新病毒战士” AntiVir的个人版经典6.32效果最佳，并获得最佳的整体评价。但是，当与一整套有偿和无偿的程序，你得到的是相当的平均水平。
AntiVir提供了一个干净的用户界面，易于使用虽然视力，而平原。它也缺乏一些关键的功能包括在大多数其他9种产品，我们测试“的新病毒战士” ，如能够扫描传入和传出的电子邮件附件感染病毒的文件，并能够隔离受感染的文件。 AntiVir也没有电话技术支持，尽一切免费的反病毒软件进行测试。
其中10个产品在试验组， AntiVir排名低于平均水平时，进行按需扫描，但表现是最好的免费程序。虽然能够检测百分之九十以上的威胁，在我们收集的后门程序，程序和特洛伊木马，它排名底部附近的包时，来检测未知威胁使用启发式，捕捉不到百分之二十五的蠕虫和后门利用一个月岁的病毒数据。 AntiVir并执行较好的扫描速度测试中，获得第四名，整体。
失踪的特点，中等业绩，缺乏技术支持电话提出AntiVir第七位。然而，新的AntiVir个人版精英赛7日，目前正处于测试阶段，提供了一个新的用户界面和一个新的启发式引擎。
结果是： AntiVir的免费保护总比没有保护所有，但该程序的性能和功能，可以更好地。
托尼布拉德利
当年PC实验室测试结果:
而当年其他杀软得分如下:
| Full Specifications | | Street price when ranked | Very Inexpensive: Free | | Performance | Performance: Good | | WildList viruses | 100% | | AV-Test zoo threats | 95% | | Heuristic detection with one-month-old signatures | 11% | | Heuristic detection with two-month-old signatures | 6% | | Scan speed (in seconds) | 265 | | Outbreak response time | 4 to 6 hours | | Support and reliability | | | Telephone support | No | | Toll-free support | Not applicable | | Cost of phone support | Not applicable | | Weekday support hours | Not applicable | | Saturday support hours | Not applicable | | E-mail or Web support | Yes |
相关资料连接:美国PC世界通信公司网站
http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/product/27558/review/personal_edition_632.html
出处:伞饭论坛 原帖:http://bbs.sanfan.com/thread-2273-1-1.html
[ 本帖最后由 boyjoo 于 2009-6-17 12:32 编辑 ] |
发表于 2009-3-21 01:03:19
包装蛮摆的！
竟然不知道这个事情，落后了啊
发表于 2009-3-21 04:17:34
