收藏本站 |切换到宽版 | 更换论坛皮肤
 找回密码  忘记邮箱  QQ快速登录  快速登录  快速注册

卡饭»论坛 › 安全区 › 国外杀毒软件 › ESET(NOD32) › 来自nod32官网的对比文章
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5593|回复: 11
收起左侧

[讨论] 来自nod32官网的对比文章

[复制链接]
The EQs
发表于 2007-2-4 14:53:22 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
Virus Bulletin 2007年2月份测试报告 (MICROSOFT WINDOWS VISTA BUSINESS EDITION (32-BIT))
Virus Bulletin Comparative Test - Platform: MICROSOFT WINDOWS VISTA BUSINESS EDITION (32-BIT),
Test Date: February 2007
(按此观看来源图表：On-Demand Tests    On-Access Tests   Hard Disk Scan Rate)

Product/防毒软件Missed viruses/遗漏病毒Scanning rate: Executables throughput (KB/s)
/ 扫描速度: 执行档处理量(KB/秒)
ESET NOD32 antivirus system043173.62
Symantec AntiVirus014542.69
Fortinet FortiClient06977.55
GDATA AntiVirusKit 200706739.30
Kaspersky Anti-Virus212118.91
F-Secure Anti-Virus for Vista 2007
57632.91
Sophos Anti-Virus346337.41
McAfee VirusScan Enterprise9611609.71
Microsoft Windows Live OneCare15515699.50
CA Anti-Virus 21013033.55
回复

举报

The EQs
 楼主| 发表于 2007-2-4 14:53:41 | 显示全部楼层
Anti-Virus Comparative
Summary Report 2006
Result, winners, comments

(按此下载测试报告 - Authorized Reprint available here)

February 2006
On-demand test 		May 2006
Retrospective test
August 2006
On-demand test

November 2006
Retrospective test
AvastADVANCEDADVANCEDADVANCEDSTANDARD
AVGSTANDARDSTANDARDSTANDARD
AVIRAADVANCED+ADVANCEDADVANCED+ADVANCED+
BitDefenderADVANCEDADVANCED+ADVANCEDADVANCED+
Dr.WebSTANDARDADVANCEDSTANDARDSTANDARD
F-ProtSTANDARDSTANDARDSTANDARDSTANDARD
F-SecureADVANCED+ADVANCEDADVANCED+STANDARD
Gdata AVK ADVANCED+ADVANCED+ADVANCED+ADVANCED+
KasperskyADVANCED+ADVANCEDADVANCED+STANDARD
McAfeeADVANCED+ADVANCEDADVANCEDSTANDARD
NOD32ADVANCED+ ADVANCED+ADVANCED+ADVANCED+
NormanSTANDARDADVANCEDADVANCEDADVANCED
SymantecADVANCED+STANDARDADVANCED+STANDARD
TrustPortADVANCED+ADVANCED+ADVANCED+ADVANCED+
VBA32 ADVANCED STANDARD
回复

举报

The EQs
 楼主| 发表于 2007-2-4 14:54:03 | 显示全部楼层
Virus Bulletin 2006年12月份测试报告 (Windows XP Professional)
Virus Bulletin Comparative Test - Platform: Windows XP Professional, Test Date: December 2006

(按此观看来源图表：On-Demand Tests    On-Access Tests   Hard Disk Scan Rate)

Product/防毒软件Missed viruses/遗漏病毒Scanning rate: Executables throughput (KB/s)
/ 扫描速度: 执行档处理量(KB/秒)
ESET NOD32 v.2.5040228.0
Symantec Antivirus 10.1.5.5000 010057.0
GDATA AntiVirusKit 2007 v.17.0.628204206.9
Kapsersky Anti-Virus 6.0.0.30325978.5
Fortinet Forticlient 3.0.349383713.4
Sophos Anti-Virus 6.0.5
4616229.2
McAfee VirusScan Enterprise 8.0i9213409.3
CA eTrust 8.0.403.021526818.7
Avira Antivir Windows Workstation v.72626751.8
VirusBuster VirusBuster Professional 2006 (x86-64) v.6.03087047.5
回复

举报

The EQs
 楼主| 发表于 2007-2-4 14:54:30 | 显示全部楼层
Why ESET's NOD32?
Technology, not brand names, stops malware.
Compare
Industry tests and data to show the differences in detection, size and speed of NOD32's top competitors. Compare the data against Symantec, McAfee, Kaspersky and Trend. Find out why NOD32 is the Safest, Fastest, Smallest solution.
Best Detection of Known and Evolving Threats
  • Approximately 88% of threats are proactively detected using ThreatSense heuristics. For example, all variants of MyDoom, Netsky, Bagle and Mytob were detected heuristically - before most other vendors even had a signature. Compare to Symantec, McAfee, Trend, and Kaspersky.
  • NOD32 receives the highest awards (ADVANCED+) in retrospective testing, due to its high proactive on-demand detection rate and low rate of false positives. NOD32 includes one of the fastest scanners in the industry, earning the status of Overall Anti-Virus product winner of 2006. (source: www.AV-Comparatives.org)
  • In-the-Wild Virus Detection - ESET is the record holder of 41 VB100% awards collected over the last 7 years. These tests validate the products ability to detect known malware. (source: www.virusbtn.com).
  • NOD32 has missed fewer In-the-Wild viruses than any other vendor in VirusBulletin testing, as shown below.
Fastest Performance
  • 19MB/sec scanning rate under Windows 2003
  • Three to 34 times faster than the leading brands under Windows XP
  • Keep employees productive by minimizing the impact on their systems

Minimal Resource Utilization
  • Utilizes approximately 22MB of RAM, one of the smallest packages in the industry
  • Low RAM usage and intelligent caching reduces disk access and memory paging
  • Low 4% performance overhead (source: Canon/ESET testing, August 2006)
NOD32與Symantec | McAfee | Trend Micro | Kaspersky 的功能比較
Compare NOD32 to Symantec | McAfee | Trend Micro | Kaspersky


NOD32SymantecMcAfeeTrend Kaspersky
Competitive
Analysis		 View Full ReportView Full ReportView Full ReportView Full Report
Comprehensive Protection
Unified Anti-Threat Engine - protects against viruses, spyware, adware, rootkits,?identity theftYesNo, multiple components required in a large suite.No, multiple components required in a large suite.No, multiple components required in a large suite No, multiple components required in a large suite.
VB100% Awards for detection of all in-the-wild viruses in the VB test sets, and without any false-alarms. (virusbulletin.com)41352815 35
Missed In-the-Wild Viruses in Virus Bulletin tests between May 1998 and December 2006 (virusbulletin.com)
- On-Access
- On-Demand		08836263
05495914
Real-time protection against 16 zero-day viruses (source: virustotal.com)87%7%33%0% 13%
Retrospective/ProActive Test by AV-Comparatives.Org on 3-month old signatures. Combined trend of May and November 2006 tests. (www.av-comparatives.org)
53%15%18%0% 7%
Performance
Executable scanning rate (December 2006, Virus Bulletin) on Windows 2003 Server x64 on AMD Athlon 64 processor40 MB/s10 MB/s13.4 MB/s19.9 MB/s 5.9 MB/s
Scanning rate of executables?(October 2006, Virus Bulletin) on Windows 2000 Server24.7 MB/s3.1 MB/s6.5 MB/s9.4 MB/s 20.7 MB/s
回复

举报

The EQs
 楼主| 发表于 2007-2-4 14:55:06 | 显示全部楼层
Virus Bulletin 2006年8月份测试报告 (Novell Netware 6.5)
Virus Bulletin Comparative Test - Platform: Novell Netware 6.5, Test Date: Auguest 2006
(按此观看来源图表：On-Demand Tests    On-Access Tests   Hard Disk Scan Rate)

Product/防毒软件Missed viruses/遗漏病毒Scanning rate: Executables throughput (KB/s)
/ 扫描速度: 执行档处理量(KB/秒)
Eset NOD3208359.1
Kaspersky Anti-Virus02056.4
Doctor Web Dr.Web02017.7
McAfee NetShield 01486.5
CA eTrust (InoculateIT) 302899.3
CA eTrust (Vet)
302595.4
Sophos Anti-Virus463924.7
VirusBuster2941633.6
Norman FireBreak3773300.8

NOD32与Symantec | McAfee | Trend Micro 的功能比较
Compare NOD32 to Symantec | McAfee | Trend Micro

NOD32SymantecMcAfeeTrend
Comprehensive Protection
Unified Anti-Threat Engine - protects against viruses, spyware, adware, identity theftYesNo, multiple components required in a large suite.No, multiple components required in a large suite.No, multiple components required in a large suite.
VB100% Awards for detection of all in-the-wild viruses in the VB test sets, and without any false-alarms. (virusbulletin.com)39332614
Missed In-the-Wild Viruses in Virus Bulletin tests between May 1998 and May 2005 (virusbulletin.com)23164
Real-time protection against 16 zero-day viruses (source: virustotal.com)88%6%31%0%
Retrospective/ProActive Test by AV-Comparatives.Org on 3-month old signatures. Combined trend of May and November 2005 tests. (www.av-comparatives.org)85%7%20%10%
Performance
Executable scanning rate (December 2005, Virus Bulletin) on Windows 2003 Server x64 on AMD Athlon 64 processor30 MB/s6.9 MB/s13 MB/sNA
Average scanning rate of executables & zipped OLE files (October 2005, Virus Bulletin) on Windows 2003 Advanced Server17,589 kB/s4,525 kB/s4,985 kB/s7,732 kB/s

Virus Bulletin 2006年6月份测试报告 (Windows XP)
Virus Bulletin Comparative Test - Platform: Windows XP, Test Date: June 2006

Product/防毒软件Missed viruses/遗漏病毒Scanning rate: Executables throughput (KB/s)
/ 扫描速度: 执行档处理量(KB/秒)
Eset NOD32017395.9
McAfee VirusScan04179.5
Symantec AntiVirus 03657.1
Avira Antivir 02681.9
MircoWorld eScanWin01566.1
GDATA AntiVirusKit01562.3
Kaspersky Anti-Virus 0506.0
NWI Virus Chaser 32595.4
Doctor Web Dr.Web 32447.3
回复

举报

The EQs
 楼主| 发表于 2007-2-4 14:58:46 | 显示全部楼层
Compared Proactive Detection
See the table below for complete accounting of how antivirus vendors products detected major worm outbreaks
Worm OutbreaksESET NOD32KasperskyMcAfeeNormanPandaSymantecTrend Micro
Proactive Detection Rate (%)
87%
13%
33%
60%
53%
7%
0%
Number Detected out of 15
13
2
5
9
8
1
0
Win32/Bagle.AH (2004-07-19)
X
X
Win32/Bagle.AI (2004-08-09)
X
NA
X
X
X
NA
Win32/MyDoom.T (2004-08-16)
X
X
X
Win32/Bagle.AJ (2004-09-01)
X
X
X
X
Win32/Netsky.B1 (2004-10-13)
X
X
X
Win32/Bagle.AS (2004-10-29)
X
Win32/Bagle.AU (2004-10-29)
X
Win32/Sober.I (2004-11-19)
Win32/Pawur.A (2004-11-22)
X
Win32/Zafi.D (2004-12-14)
X
X
X1
NA
Win32/Bagle.AW (2005-01-27)
X
X
X1
Win32/Bagle.AX (2005-01-27)
X
X
X1
Win32/MyDoom.R.MEW (2005-02-16)
X
X
X
X1
Win32/Sober.O (2005-05-02)
X
X
X
X1
NA
Win32/Zotob (2005-8-29)
X
X
Source: www.VirusTotal.com, aggregated statistics through August 29, 2005. Performance data based on VirusBulletin testing of the Windows 2003 Advanced Server (Virusbulletin, October 2005).

X Detected by Heuristics (Global Threat)
X1 Stopped by Behaviour Blocker (cannot be used on email servers)
NA Product didn't participate on the report
(*) Panda TruPrevent is included on the reports since December 2004

Virus Bulletin 2006年4月份测试报告(Red Hat Linux 9平台)
Virus Bulletin Comparative Test - Platform: Red Hat Linux 9, Test Date: April 2006
(按此观看来源图表：On-Demand Tests   On-Access Tests   Hard Disk Scan Rate)
Product/防毒软件Missed viruses/遗漏病毒Scanning rate: Executables throughput (KB/s) / 扫描速度: 执行档处理量(KB/秒)
Eset NOD32018918.8
Symantec AntiVirus07828.6
MicroWorld eScan Anti-Virus07541.0
Kaspersky Anti-Virus05761.4
Doctor Web Dr.Web 04949.0
F-Secure Anti-Virus25761.7
Avira AntiVir67845.2
McAfee LinuxShield587268.4
SOFTWIN BitDefender1506290.8
Alwil avast! 3038048.9
Virus Bulletin 2006年2月份测试报告 (Windows NT 4.0 Workstation)
Virus Bulletin Comparative Test - Platform: Windows NT 4.0 Workstation, Test Date: February 2006
(按此观看来源图表：On-Demand Tests    On-Access Tests   Hard Disk Scan Rate)
Product/防毒软件Missed viruses/遗漏病毒Scanning rate: Executables throughput (KB/s)
/ 扫描速度: 执行档处理量(KB/秒)
Eset NOD3204143.4
H+BEDV AntiVir01139.4
Avira Avira Desktop01127.7
MicroWorld eScanWin 01120.8
GDATA AntiVirusKit 0866.8
Kaspersky Anti-Virus 21186.4
Dr.Web Dr.Web31260.2
F-Secure Anti-Virus 41860.3
Commad AntiVirus 72486.1
[table=98%]
[/td][/tr][tr][td=1,1,680]
Virus Bulletin 2005年12月份测试报告 (Windows Server 2003 Enterprise X64 Version)
Virus Bulletin Comparative Test - Platform: Windows Server 2003 Enterprise X64 Version, Test Date: December 2005
(按此观看来源图表：On-Demand Tests   On-Access Tests   Hard Disk Scan Rate)
Product/防毒软件Missed viruses/遗漏病毒Scanning rate: Executables throughput (KB/s)
/ 扫描速度: 执行档处理量(KB/秒)
Eset NOD32030385.1
Symantec SAV 06923.2
Kaspersky KAV 26434.5
GDATA AntiVirusKit 32819.2
CA eTrust Antivirus (I) 1610319.5
CA eTrust Antivirus (V)3212430.3
Anti-Virus Comparative No.8
Proactive / retrospective test
(on-demand detection of virus / malware), November 2005
(按此下载测试报告 - Authorized Reprint available here)
NOD3262%ADVANCED+
BitDefender49%ADVANCED+
McAfee35%ADVANCED
Kaspersky32%ADVANCED
Dr.Web25%ADVANCED
TrendMicro19%STANDARD
F-Prot17%STANDARD
Avast , H+BEDV 14%STANDARD
Symantec11%STANDARD
AVG4%
----------
Virus Bulletin 2005年10月份测试报告 (Windows Server 2003 平台)
Virus Bulletin Comparative Test - Platform: Windows Server 2003, Test Date: October 2005
(按此观看来源图表：On-Demand Tests   On-Access Tests   Hard Disk Scan Rate)
Product/防毒软件Missed viruses/遗漏病毒Scan time (sec) executables/扫描速度(秒)
NOD32027
Norton Antivirus 0147
Doctor Web0352
Avira0465
H+BEDV0470
Kaspersky2116
F-Secure Anti-Virus3124
Sophos995
FRISK12154
McAfee2998
[/td][/tr][tr][td]
[/td][/tr][tr][td=1,1,680]
Virus Bulletin 2005年8月份测试报告 (Netware 6.5)
Virus Bulletin Comparative Test - Platform: Netware 6.5, Test Date: August 2005
(按此观看来源图表：On-Demand Tests    On-Access Tests   Hard Disk Scan Rate)
Product/防毒软件Missed viruses/遗漏病毒Scanning rate: Executables throughput (KB/s)
/ 扫描速度: 执行档处理量(KB/秒)
Eset NOD3207292.4
McAfee NetShield 01302.2
Kaspersky Anti-Virus31919.1
Doctor Web Dr.Web143038.5
CA eTrust Antivirus 302048.4
Sophos Anti-Virus
353598.2
Anti-Virus Comparative No.6
Proactive / retrospective test
(on-demand detection of virus / malware), May 2005
(按此下载测试报告 - Authorized Reprint available here)
NOD3270%ADVANCED+
BitDefender49%ADVANCED+
Kaspersky48%ADVANCED+
Dr.Web37%ADVANCED
Sophos34%ADVANCED
McAfee30%ADVANCED
F-Prot19%STANDARD
TrendMicro15%STANDARD
Symantec14%STANDARD
H+BEDV12%STANDARD
Avast 11%STANDARD
RAV8%
STANDARD
AVG4%----------
Virus Bulletin 2005年4月份测试报告 (Red Hat Linux 9平台)
Virus Bulletin Comparative Test - Platform: Red Hat Linux 9, Test Date: April 2005
(按此观看来源图表：On-Demand Tests    On-Access Tests   Hard Disk Scan Rate)
Product/防毒软件Missed viruses/遗漏病毒Scan time (sec) executables/扫描速度(秒)
NOD32040
Kaspersky0143
F-Secure Anti-Virus2168
Doctor Web2186
FRISK3114
McAfee3170
H+BEDV5358
Avira5416
Sophos3164
BitDefender133304
Virus Bulletin 2005年2月份测试报告 (Windows NT 4.0)
Virus Bulletin Comparative Test - Platform: Windows NT 4.0, Test Date: February 2005
(按此观看来源图表：On-Demand Tests    On-Access Tests   Hard Disk Scan Rate)
Product/防毒软件Missed viruses/遗漏病毒Scanning rate: Executables throughput (KB/s)
/ 扫描速度: 执行档处理量(KB/秒)
Eset NOD3205208.9
Symantec SAV 02278.9
MicroWorld eScan 01100.5
GDATA AntiVirusKit 0787.0
Kaspersky KAV 22288.4
Doctor Web Dr.Web
32398.8
NWI Virus Chaser 42307.7
F-Secure Anti-Virus 72025.7
McAfee VirusScan 83275.0
Authentium Command 92543.9
Ram Footprint
Source: Scott Brown, Colby Sawyer Case Study, November 2004
NOD32 is by far one of the smallest applications in the industry, especially for providing protection against such a wide range of threats. The NOD32 v2.5 installer is just 8.6 MB
The program utilizes approximately 15 to 22 MB of RAM. This, along with intelligent caching reduces disk access and memory paging, adding to performance. (Source: Scott Brown, Colby Sawyer Case Study, November 2004)
Product/防毒?件MB in RAM when idle/
NOD3213
Kaspersky22
McAfee31
Sophos27
Symantec24
TrendMicro28
Panda55
Anti-Virus Comparative No.4
Proactive / retrospective test
(on-demand detection of virus / malware), November 2004
(按此下载测试报告 - Authorized Reprint available here)
NOD3249%ADVANCED+
Kaspersky43%ADVANCED+
BitDefender35%ADVANCED+
Dr.Web32%ADVANCED+
McAfee29%ADVANCED+
Panda21%ADVANCED
Symantec19%ADVANCED
Sophos13%STANDARD
H+BEDV12%STANDARD
F-Prot9%STANDARD
RAV, Avast 8%
STANDARD
TrendMicro4%----------
Virus Bulletin
回复

举报

The EQs
 楼主| 发表于 2007-2-4 14:59:42 | 显示全部楼层
Virus Bulletin 2004年8月份测试报告 (Netware 平台)
Virus Bulletin Comparative Test - Platform: Netware, Test Date: August 2004
(按此下载测试报告 - Authorized Reprint available here)

Product/防毒软件Missed viruses/遗漏病毒Scanning rate: Executables throughput (KB/s)
/ 扫描速度: 执行档处理量(KB/秒)
NOD3207103.0
Norton Antivirus03906.7
DialogueScience32629.5
Kaspersky31967.4
McAfee4994.4
eTrust322103.6
Sophos453824.7
Norman3862010.8
VirusBuster12371886.0

Canon 防毒软件性能报告
日本 Canon 公司就?面上包括 NOD32 在内的 4 款防毒软件, 作出的性能测试报告。
根据报告, NOD32 无论在性能及速度上, 都抛离其它对手。

下載 powerpoint    简体    英文    繁体





Virus Bulletin 2004年6月份测试报告 (Windows XP平台)
Virus Bulletin Comparative Test - Platform: Windows XP, Test Date: June 2004
(按此观看来源图表：On-Demand Tests   On-Access Tests   Hard Disk Scan Rate)

Product/防毒软件Missed viruses/遗漏病毒Scan time (sec) executables/扫描速度(秒)
NOD32039
Norton Antivirus0164
F-Secure Anti-Virus4175
NAI McAfee6101
Kaspersky11152
Sophos4867
Norman309451
Trend Micro44869
AVG1118114

Virus Bulletin 2004年2月份测试报告 (Windows NT平台)
Virus Bulletin Comparative Test - Platform: Windows NT, Test Date: Feb 2004
(按此下载测试报告 - Authorized Reprint available here)

Product/防毒软件Missed viruses/遗漏病毒Scan time (sec) executables/扫描速度(秒)
NOD320279
Norton Antivirus0479
Kaspersky2467
F-Secure Anti-Virus4488
NAI McAfee6354
Sophos46314
Norman179708
Trend PC-cillin446298
AVG810536

Virus Bulletin 2003年11月份测试报告 (Windows 2003 Server)
Virus Bulletin Comparative Test - Platform: Windows 2003 Server, Test Date: November 2003
(按此下载测试报告 - Authorized Reprint available here)

(按此观看来源图表：On-Demand Tests   On-Access Tests   Hard Disk Scan Rate)

Product/防毒软件Missed viruses/遗漏病毒Scanning rate: Executables throughput (KB/s)
/ 扫描速度: 执行档处理量(KB/秒)
Eset NOD3209270.0
Symantec SAV 04340.7
DialogueScience Dr.Web 01953.3
GDATA AntiVirusKit 11286.9
NAI McAfee VirusScan 65944.9
F-Secure Anti-Virus62681.0
CA Vet Anti-Virus
107012.0
CA eTrust Antivirus 126286.6
FRISK F-Prot Antivirus 126145.3
Kaspersky KAV 134340.7

Virus Bulletin 2003年8月份测试报告 (Netware平台)
Virus Bulletin Comparative Test - Platform: Netware 6, Test Date: August 2003
(按此下载测试报告 - Authorized Reprint available here)

Product/防毒软件Missed viruses/遗漏病毒Scan time (sec) executables/扫描速度(秒)
NOD32073
NAI McAfee6581
CA Innoculate IT14751
Norton AntiVirus35155
Sophos167166
Norman390377
Trend Micro did not submit a product for this test.

Virus Bulletin 2003年6月份测试报告 (Windows XP平台)
Virus Bulletin Comparative Test - Platform: Windows XP, Test Date: June 2003
(按此下载测试报告 - Authorized Reprint available here)

Product/防毒软件Missed viruses/遗漏病毒Scan time (sec) executables/扫描速度(秒)
NOD32027
Norton Antivirus0138
Kaspersky1188
NAI McAfee4105
F-Secure Anti-Virus4208
Sophos8669
Norman189190
Trend PC-cillin22277

Virus Bulletin 2002年6月份至2004年2月份测试总结 (平台包括: Windows XP, 2000, NT及Netware 6)
Summary of 7 Virus Bulletin Comparative Tests - Platforms: Windows XP, 2000, NT and Netware 6
Test Date: June 2002 to Feb 2004
(按此下载测试报告 - Authorized Reprint available here)

Product/防毒软件Missed viruses/遗漏病毒
NOD320
Kaspersky31
Norton Antivirus89
NAI McAfee77
Sophos1070
Trend PC-Cillin2225
Symantec (Norton Antivirus) did not submit their product for the Netware test so their aggregate score is for 6 tests only.

Virus Bulletin 2002年6月份至11月份性能及速度比较 (Windows XP & 2000 Advanced Server平台)
Detection & Performance Comparisons - Test Platforms: Windows XP Professional & Windows 2000 Advanced Server

DETECTION
PERFORMANCE


累积测试结果
Cumulative results of the test results, Test Date: July 2001

Antivirus products/防毒软件Missed viruses/遗漏病毒Hard Disk scantime in seconds
(executable files)
扫描速度(秒)
Eset NOD32DOS052
NAI VirusScan0960
DialogueScience DrWeb01674
Kaspersky Lab AvpDOS3201920
Command Antivirus3209
FRISK F-Prot3219
F-Secure Antivirus3219
CA Inocucmd9644
Symantec Norton AntiVirus171260
GeCAD RAV25667
Norman Virus Control362769
Trend Micro PCSScan69806
CA Vet Rescue91703
VirusBuster106590
Grisoft AVG2061039
Sophos SWEEP2421140
Alwill Lguard316108
HAURI ViRobot123391589
NOD32 excels in July 2001 Virus Bulletin tests, detecting 100% of all the samples in all test sets and achieving impressive Hard Disk Scan Rates of the executable files, outperforming all other products by overwhelming margins (2-53 times!).

"The full detection of all samples in the test set is almost expected now, but the speed of scanning was even more remarkable." (Matthew Ham, Virus Bulletin, July 2001)
Record Winner of the Virus Bulletin 100% Award
NOD32 Antivirus has been awarded more VB100% Awards than any other AV product.
NOD32 Antivirus extends its stunning performance in Virus Bulletin's tests and receives its unprecedented 27th VB100% award! NOD32 remains the only antivirus product in the world that has not missed any In the Wild virus in Virus Bulletin tests for more than 6 years and has received more coveted Virus Bulletin 100% Awards than any competing antivirus product.

NOD32's awesome scanning rate of 9.270 kB/s (which is more than twice the speed of the second competing product with 100% detection) beats the generally accepted paradigm: a product can be either fast or have excellent detection; NOD32 provides both with a minimal impact on CPU cycles.

Due to NOD32's Advanced Heuristics Technology Eset's antivirus product is able to detect a very high rate of the unidentified (and not yet analyzed) viruses without any need to update the virus signature database. This state-of-the-art feature provides the user an ultimate advantage protecting his computer against viruses that may hit the streets in the future.
In fact, in all tests conducted by Virus Bulletin Magazine since May 1998 NOD32 has not missed a single in-the-wild virus.
NOTE:  NOD32 did miss out on the VB100% Award in Nov 2000.  It detected all of the viruses, but produced a single false-alarm.  Result: no award.
In the first test conducted by Virus Bulletin on the Suse Linux platform in April 2002, NOD32 did detect all in-the-wild viruses but for other reasons it, and all other products tested, were deemed to have failed the tests.
All Brand, Product names, and Trademarks mentioned in this web site are acknowledged as the property of their respective owners.

回复

举报

黑暗亚当
发表于 2007-2-4 15:30:04 | 显示全部楼层
支持下，自己会防护，不乱XXOO，只有要好的防御就行
回复

举报

ly250094040
发表于 2007-2-4 16:13:16 | 显示全部楼层
LZ把楼都占完了....
回复

举报

93044821
发表于 2007-2-4 16:24:50 | 显示全部楼层
呵呵,NOD32确实不错!
回复

举报

下一页 »
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
高级模式
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 快速注册

本版积分规则

手机版|杀毒软件|软件论坛| 卡饭论坛

Copyright © KaFan  KaFan.cn All Rights Reserved.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4( 沪ICP备2020031077号-2 ) GMT+8, 2025-1-7 14:35 , Processed in 0.130770 second(s), 17 queries .

卡饭网所发布的一切软件、样本、工具、文章等仅限用于学习和研究，不得将上述内容用于商业或者其他非法用途，否则产生的一切后果自负，本站信息来自网络，版权争议问题与本站无关，您必须在下载后的24小时之内从您的电脑中彻底删除上述信息，如有问题请通过邮件与我们联系。

快速回复 客服 返回顶部 返回列表