查看: 4101|回复: 16
收起左侧

[已解决] Mcafee没有通过2007年2月vb100% vista测试的原因

[复制链接]
The EQs
发表于 2007-2-13 20:08:14 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
'A false sense of security is a dangerous thing', says VB technical consultant.
In the wake of the recent VB100 test on the new Windows Vista platform, VB has been in communication with the makers of many of the products tested. The developers of one of those adjudged to have failed the test, McAfee, have insisted that when their VirusScan product is fully updated with the data provided for testing it is capable of detecting the samples missed during our tests.
After intensive investigation, VB has found that detection routines for the two malware samples missed were indeed included in the update package provided by McAfee. However, when McAfee's manual update procedure was run it failed to apply the update to the product, despite both on-screen messages and logs stating that the product had been updated successfully. This behaviour was reproducible throughout the review period and has continued to be the case in several subsequent retests.
The problem was found to be a result of the way in which McAfee VirusScan interacts with User Access Controls (UAC) included in Windows Vista. Despite being run by a user logged on with administrator rights, the update program designed for use in sealed environments like the VB test lab was also required to be executed with the 'Run as administrator' option to succeed, but did not report this to the user or display an error messages when the update failed.
'We feel fully justified in denying the product the VB100 in this case,' said John Hawes, Technical Consultant at Virus Bulletin. 'The product reported it had updated itself. A user who is fooled into thinking they are running up-to-date protection is in as bad a position as one who is running up-to-date but inadequate protection; a false sense of security is a dangerous thing.'
'Users with more standard update methods would apparently not have had the same issue we did,' continued Hawes. 'The problem we had can be put down not to an inability by McAfee to keep up with the latest malware, but rather to a failure to properly integrate all aspects of the product into the new Vista operating system, and most importantly the new security controls. Vista caused trouble for a lot of products and this, though seemingly a minor issue, had a major effect on the protection provided by McAfee's product.'
The EQs
 楼主| 发表于 2007-2-13 20:09:38 | 显示全部楼层
只是一个升级问题就导致没通过。。。啥也不说了。。。。。
7sumetai
发表于 2007-2-13 20:28:46 | 显示全部楼层
怕是McAfee没有交足保护费吧
The EQs
 楼主| 发表于 2007-2-13 20:29:59 | 显示全部楼层
原帖由 7sumetai 于 2007-2-13 20:28 发表
怕是McAfee没有交足保护费吧

从升级这个问题就可以看出vb100%还是很严格的。。。不仅仅考虑扫描速度,漏杀率,查杀率,系统兼容性。。还要考虑升级性等等。。。
7sumetai
发表于 2007-2-13 20:32:44 | 显示全部楼层
原帖由 EQ2 于 2007-2-13 20:29 发表

从升级这个问题就可以看出vb100%还是很严格的。。。不仅仅考虑扫描速度,漏杀率,查杀率,系统兼容性。。还要考虑升级性等等。。。

你不知道最近流行黑幕论嘛?
The EQs
 楼主| 发表于 2007-2-13 20:35:17 | 显示全部楼层
黑幕论???偶还是相信这个世界有良知的人。。。。有一个公正的。。。。。
deane_tiantian
发表于 2007-2-13 20:36:34 | 显示全部楼层
老外在很多问题上比国人有原则的多
猜不出你是谁
头像被屏蔽
发表于 2007-2-14 09:51:23 | 显示全部楼层
写的什么,看不懂
wangjay1980
发表于 2007-2-14 09:56:06 | 显示全部楼层
偶尔一次
superwcno1
头像被屏蔽
发表于 2007-2-16 00:44:51 | 显示全部楼层
永远支持咖啡,谁用谁知道啊
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 快速注册

本版积分规则

手机版|杀毒软件|软件论坛| 卡饭论坛

Copyright © KaFan  KaFan.cn All Rights Reserved.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4( 沪ICP备2020031077号-2 ) GMT+8, 2024-5-2 11:06 , Processed in 0.130258 second(s), 17 queries .

卡饭网所发布的一切软件、样本、工具、文章等仅限用于学习和研究,不得将上述内容用于商业或者其他非法用途,否则产生的一切后果自负,本站信息来自网络,版权争议问题与本站无关,您必须在下载后的24小时之内从您的电脑中彻底删除上述信息,如有问题请通过邮件与我们联系。

快速回复 客服 返回顶部 返回列表