查看: 1560|回复: 6
收起左侧

[资讯] 咖啡的邮件``

[复制链接]
c5132902
发表于 2009-7-29 14:00:39 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
Here are my latest test findings with the newest RC 5400 release. It looks on par with the other versions.

-Leith


·
8.5i P8 with 5300 engine w/o Artemis = 158 minutes
·
8.7i with 5300 engine = 150 minutes
·
8.7i with 5400 Beta1 engine = 148 minutes
·
8.7i P1 with 5300 engine = 102
·
8.7i P1 with 5300 engine w/o Artemis = 105
·
8.7i P1 with 5400 Beta1 engine = 105 minutes
·
8.7i P1 with 5400 Beta2 engine = 104 minutes
·
8.7i P1 with 5400 RC engine = 101 minutes
·
8.7i P1 with 5400 Beta2 engine (w/o Artemis, Cookies, Registry) = 88 minutes
·
8.7i P1 with 5400 RC engine (w/o Artemis, Cookies, Registry) = 89 minutes
·
/NOMEM /MIME /unzip /PROGRAM /SUB /SECURE /clean
·
CMD Line 5300 (w/o Artemis, Cookies, Registry) = 82 minutes
·
CMD Line 5400 Beta2 V1 DATS 32bit (w/o Artemis, Cookies, Registry) = 78 minutes
·
CMD Line 5400 Beta2 V2 DATS 32bit (w/o Artemis, Cookies, Registry) = 77 minutes
·
CMD Line 5400 RC V2 DATS 32bit (w/o Artemis, Cookies, Registry) = 79 minutes


From:Leith Tussing [mailto:ltussing@crata.ucf.edu]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 10:04 AM
To: Engine-Beta
Subject: RE: [engine-beta] no performance boost with 5400 in command line version




I redid my tests because I had accidentally left out the /SECURE command which makes a significant difference.  I also realized I had done my GUI test slightly differently too so I changed it to be more in line as well.  My new set of tests show that the CLI and GUI are much closer to each other than my previous numbers.  The 5400 CLI is also showing a slight performance increase over the 5300 engine as well with this setting enabled.

These are the CLI items that would impact performance in my testing.
/NOMEM /MIME /unzip /PROGRAM /SUB /SECURE /clean

-Leith


·
8.5i P8 with 5300 engine w/o Artemis = 158 minutes
·
8.7i with 5300 engine = 150 minutes
·
8.7i with 5400 Beta1 engine = 148 minutes
·
8.7i P1 with 5300 engine = 102
·
8.7i P1 with 5300 engine w/o Artemis = 105
·
8.7i P1 with 5400 Beta1 engine = 105 minutes
·
8.7i P1 with 5400 Beta2 engine = 104 minutes
·
8.7i P1 with 5400 Beta2 engine (w/o Artemis, Cookies, Registry) = 88 minutes
·
/NOMEM /MIME /unzip /PROGRAM /SUB /SECURE /clean
·
CMD Line 5300 (w/o Artemis, Cookies, Registry) = 82 minutes
·
CMD Line 5400 Beta2 V1 DATS 32bit (w/o Artemis, Cookies, Registry) = 78 minutes
·
CMD Line 5400 Beta2 V2 DATS 32bit (w/o Artemis, Cookies, Registry) = 77 minutes
sanshui-1
发表于 2009-7-29 14:26:52 | 显示全部楼层
看不懂,没翻译,沙发
tetris
头像被屏蔽
发表于 2009-7-31 20:09:45 | 显示全部楼层
扫描快慢的比较

不过全都是 without artemis……
悠柚
发表于 2009-7-31 20:11:08 | 显示全部楼层
当然是命令行扫的最快
悠柚
发表于 2009-7-31 20:11:43 | 显示全部楼层
只不过说明5400引擎会比其他的快点
sololp 该用户已被删除
发表于 2009-8-1 22:04:25 | 显示全部楼层
资源占用和速度是5400的重点改进项目
gho
发表于 2009-8-2 22:17:52 | 显示全部楼层
5400改进还是比较大的
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 快速注册

本版积分规则

手机版|杀毒软件|软件论坛| 卡饭论坛

Copyright © KaFan  KaFan.cn All Rights Reserved.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4( 沪ICP备2020031077号-2 ) GMT+8, 2024-11-26 02:44 , Processed in 0.129967 second(s), 16 queries .

卡饭网所发布的一切软件、样本、工具、文章等仅限用于学习和研究,不得将上述内容用于商业或者其他非法用途,否则产生的一切后果自负,本站信息来自网络,版权争议问题与本站无关,您必须在下载后的24小时之内从您的电脑中彻底删除上述信息,如有问题请通过邮件与我们联系。

快速回复 客服 返回顶部 返回列表