呵呵,很多人爱的ZA现在也可以不考虑了。我也曾经很爱ZA,但是6.5版后的表现让我失望,尤其是7.0 最新版的Logo让人很难接受。不知道他们有审美观没有
也好,现在一心爱KIS,希望它能表现得更好
What we have now from our point of view:
1) based on the test from http://www.matousec.com/projects/windows-p...sts-results.php
- KIS 411 has 7450 points,
- KIS 411 fails the tests BITStester, Breakout, Breakout2, CPILSuite3(test 3), DNStester, Osfwbypass, Surfer + 6 FPR tests (?/38)
2) KIS 6.0.2.573 passes the following tests:
BITStester - 125 (Hidden data sending - enabled by default),
Breakout - 125 (Hidden data sendind - enabled by default),
Breakout2 - 100 (Starting Internet Browser with parameters - enabled only in Interactive mode),
CPILSuite3 (test 3) - 100 (Invader(loader) - enabled only in Interactive mode),
Osfwbypass - 100 (Starting Internet Browser with parameters - enabled only in Interactive mode),
Surfer - 100 (Starting Internet Browser with parameters - enabled only in Interactive mode),
+ 5 or 6 FPR tests also will be passed now.
So KIS should improve its result by 650+(300-600 points - I am not sure about FPR tests).
In any case KIS will surpass ZoneAlarm & Trend Micro in the result table.
Wewill consider our 3-rd place as the best possible result because we arenot going to fight against specific solutions from Comodo and Jetico(the only difference will be in the default settings - we are sure thatour settings is the best balance for 95% of Internet users). |