个人观点:自保是杀软整个安全体系中必要且重要的一环,但并不一定是最重要的,这要根据用户的需求来定,比如说当电脑里存放着重要数据资料的时候,因为对家庭用户而言经常遭遇黑客骚扰的情况还是比较少见的,而且强悍的自保往往也意味着对系统资源占用较大.不过,随着互联网全球范围的不断延伸与发展,面对日趋泛滥的各类黑客型木马病毒,这一环节也必将越来越受到用户的普遍重视了.
以下是转载的:
法國黑客大會--駭客無法破解Dr.web是七套唯一
本帖最后由 黑衣~魂 于 2009-11-12 01:19 编辑
根據俄羅斯cnews 10.11.09文章,我就翻譯一下
在10下旬,國際研討會舉辦測試侵略性攻擊系統與防毒軟體的測試。
七名駭客分別針對七套防毒軟體進行攻擊與測試,時間1小時。
測試軟件:McAfee, Norton, G-Data, Kaspersky,DrWeb, AVG, Eset NOD32
除了drweb外,其他軟體在60分鐘內都被破解。 http://news.drweb.com/show/?i=678&c=5
November 9, 2009
The Dr.Web anti-virus from Doctor Web turned out to be the only one out of 7 widely used anti-virus programs that wouldn’t give in to participants of the International Alternative Workshop on Aggressive under the aegis of the ESIEA.
The first (International Alternative Workshop on Aggressive Computing and Security was held on October 23-25 in Laval, France. As a part of the event seven anti-viruses were tested to determine if their self-protection could be disabled in sixty minutes. Anti-viruses were tested on Windows machines and testers had administrator’s privileges in the systems. For more information about the testing visit ESIEA’s web-site.
The test showed that self-protection of anti-viruses from such vendors as Kaspersky Lab and Eset could be disabled in 40 and 33 minutes respectively while the defence mechanism of Norton Antivirus would break much sooner, in 4 minutes. The McAfee anti-virus was the quickest to fall and surrendered to testers in 2 minutes. AVG and G Data anti-virus solutions also failed to pass the test. Russian Dr.Web turned was the only anti-virus that wasn’t disabled in sixty minutes. All vendors that participated in the testing received information about vulnerabilities found in their products.
|
下面是雷人的谷歌翻译:
[ 本帖最后由 llkkll 于 2009-11-29 12:59 编辑 ] |