我们应该如何判定一个杀毒软件评比的可参考性

mofunzone

这个是av-comparative最新发布的文档，其中包含了对于若干评测的看法，虽然肯定有偏见，刨除对各个测试的评价，测试最后的总结很有意义
1. How big is the sample size? What does the sample group represent?
   测试的样本数量有多少？有那些测试的样本类型？
2. who is behind the anti-virus test? Has/Have she/he/they enough experience/knowledge/resources to perform the test?
   是谁在进行反病毒测试？他/她/他们有没有足够的经验，知识，资源来进行测试？
   p.s 对eq2同学的测试表示怀疑
3.Is the test-set free of garbage and other things like toosl, etc.? Did the tester verity the samples in anyway?
   测试是建立在垃圾文件之上和黑客工具等的吗？测试人员有没有验证样本？
4. Are the result reproducible, can they be verified? Do the anti-virus vendors get the miss samples after the test in order to be able to verified the results?
   测试结构具有可再生性吗?可以被验证吗？反病毒厂家有在测试之后得到缺失样本来进行结果验证吗？
5. Which setting were used? Were all product tested using the same setting?
   使用了什么样的设置？所有的测试产品都使用了相同的设置吗？
6. When was the test performed? Are the result already outdated?
   测试是在什么时候进行的？测试结果已经过期了吗？
7. Were the products tested under the same conditions and were they all updated at the same time/day?
   测试的产品有在相同的环境下测试并且在同一时间/日期升级吗？
8. How were the products tested? Is the test methodology known/published and generally accepted by other anti-virus researchers and vendors?
   产品是怎样被测试的？测试的方法已知/被发布并被广泛的反病毒研究人员和厂商所接受吗？
9. Has the tester any financial interest in the ranking outcome of the test?
   测试人员有没有在测试结果排名上的经济利益？
   p.s vb100%已然出局
10. What is the goal of the test? What was tested? What do the result tell?
   测试的目的是什么？有哪些被测试？结果能说明什么？

这些就是怎样判断一个测试的参考性的指标，Whildlist测试基本不能说明什么了，有兴趣的人详细读地2.2章
病毒样本滞后，病毒种类缺失，测试中采用重复样本
不过vb100%也说明了，如果你在用的产品连vb100%都没法通过，那么可以考虑更换了，因为itw已经是被广泛接受的最低级测试了

[ 本帖最后由 mofunzone 于 2007-4-25 18:49 编辑 ]

154161

自己用 然后没感觉到机子多大的异常就可以了