Real-World and Malware Protection Tests September 2017

784696777

AV-Comparatives Releases September 2017 Results of their Real-World and Malware Protection Test.

Real-World Protection Test Results can be found here
Malware Protection Test Results can be found here

Real-World Protection Test

AV-Comparatives’ Real-World Protection Test for September 2017 is based on a test set of real live test cases (malicious URLs found in the field). AV-Comparatives’ Real-World Protection Test is currently the most comprehensive and sophisticated test available, using a large number of test cases. The detailed overall result reports that are released in July and December also contain a false-alarm test that lists the awards the malware protection products reached based on their overall scores during the respective five-month period.

Malware Protection Test

The Malware Protection Test assesses a security program’s ability to protect a system against infection by malicious files before, during or after execution. The methodology used for each product tested is as follows. Prior to execution, all the test samples are subjected to on-access and on-demand scans by the security program, with each of these being done both offline and online. Any samples that have not been detected by any of these scans are then executed on the test system, with Internet/cloud access available, to allow e.g. behavioural detection features to come into play.

Even products that sometimes reach 100% protection rates in a test do not always protect against all threats on the web. It only shows that they were able to block 100% of the widespread malicious samples used in a test. Users are also advised to keep their system and third-party applications up-to-date/patched as this can dramatically decrease the risk posed by exploits.

---

About AV-Comparatives

AV-Comparatives is an independent organization offering systematic testing to check whether security software, such as PC/Mac-based antivirus products and mobile security solutions, lives up to its promises. Using one of the largest sample collections worldwide, it creates a real-world environment for truly accurate testing. AV-Comparatives offers freely accessible results to individuals, news organizations and scientific institutions. Certification by AV-Comparatives provides an official seal of approval for software performance, which is globally recognized.

The results can be used by editors / media / bloggers etc. for free. Please give as source http://www.av-comparatives.org

欧阳宣

http://bbs.kafan.cn/thread-2105737-1-1.html

784696777

欧阳宣 发表于 2017-10-17 00:31
http://bbs.kafan.cn/thread-2105737-1-1.html

那你删了吧

B100D1E55

Symantec和WD那个误检率
不知道realworld和protection test的样本集到底差多大，里面有的厂家的测试结果似乎挺矛盾的

欧阳宣

784696777 发表于 2017-10-17 00:40
那你删了吧

哈哈我也删不了啊

hikehiking

老铁的误报扎心了

ELOHIM

AV-Comparatives 之 Microsoft 2017年度 9 月份排名

真实世界保护测试：99.7%        13误报    第 7 名         共21位参赛

恶意软件保护测试：98.86%      6误报      最后一名       共21位参赛

误报控制测试平台：错误警报 6 个样本     第 9 名          共21位参赛

ccboxes

有区别是很正常的，测试方法不同。

恶意软件防护测试就是我们通常说的双击测试。
而真实世界的方法要复杂一些，包含电子邮件、挂马网址、文档等等。

让我好奇的是WD的黄条哪里来的？至今未见过WD的询问，我看十有八九是把SmartScreen也算上了。

裂空我爱杰

卡巴和BD还是依旧稳定，，非常给力。

HEMM

咖啡看起来真舒服惹，就是女神下手太重，要是本地能控制它的暴脾气就好惹。