本帖最后由 mogu6666 于 2022-7-23 14:40 编辑
BD我都不敢和别的一块装(Fatdefender)
Sacrifacing your PC on cost FatDefender that can't work without eating 80% of your RAM because of ordering too much food from the Fast-Food restaurants I respect your opinion too, but if that FatDefender would be improved a lot, he couldn't eat too much than 150MB RAM max. If he's eating more than 150MB max, then he deserves to be called "FatDefender" instead of "Bitdefender". Because antivirus shouldn't be so addicted from RAM by ordering so much Fast-Food through our PC.
当然,以上言论可以看作是调侃
I'm sorry, but I can't agree with that. Bitdefender has improved a lot and I have seen it work very well on machines that have little RAM capacity. There are people who prefer to look at the glass as half empty. I particularly respect all of them, but I see that on the other hand, Bitdefender uses almost no CPU
https://blog.emsisoft.com/en/221 ... ually-a-good-thing/
BD的内存占用和其他比起来是真大,而且重武器没必要再搞个辅助杀软了
PS:第五(除去国内杀软)大概率MD
剩下的 GDXXX/NOXXXX/MCXXXX/EMXXXXXX/ADAXXX/AHXXXX/FSXXXXX这几个以及一堆OEM我感觉都差不多
蛐蛐和panda必须垫底 那几个评测看看就行,图一乐ESET主防是不行,但是好歹是收费的(当然,MD的大号MDE单说)
而且那几个测试似乎对ESET并不公平 BD那麦克风防护有了跟没有没啥区别,摄像头防护还是可以的
|