回复 13楼 绿茵守望者 的帖子
Another
newcomer
to our tests,
Chinese
developer
Keniu provided
version 1 of
its product. An
install package
labelled ‘beta’
and some as yet untranslated areas of the interface (notably
the EULA) hinted that the product is at a fairly early stage
of development. Based on the Kaspersky engine, the product
was provided as a 76MB install package, which ran through
simply and, despite a 20-second pause to ‘analyse the
system’, was all done in under a minute, no reboot required.
The interface is simple, bright and breezy, with large
buttons marking the major functions and a limited but
easy-to-use set of options. On-demand speeds were fairly
slow, but on-access times not bad at all, while performance
measures were fairly hefty. In the detection sets we had
a few issues, with logs trimmed to miss off the ends of
longer fi le paths, despite the GUI claiming to have exported
logs ‘completely’. In the on-access tests we noticed the
product getting heavily bogged down if left going for too long. Files seemed to be being processed extremely slowly
after being left over a weekend and detection had clearly
stopped working some time and several thousand samples
before we eventually gave up on it. By re-running this in
smaller chunks, and piecing logs back together based on
unique elements in the paths, we were able to obtain some
pretty decent results, as expected from the quality engine
underlying things. Without any problems in the clean sets
and with a clear run through the WildList, Keniu earns its
fi rst VB100 award despite some teething problems when the
product is put under heavy stress.
这是可牛的
|