PC World AV Chart……【重新总结版】

piratk

权威与否，大家暂且搁置一边…… 不过经过确认，这个评测是AV-test给pc杂志做的，在这里发表一下我个人看法。
大家不要只是简简单单的看谁第一谁第二，详细的里面更要仔细看一下，如果你想获得更多信息•Malware detection rate:  Proactive detection:  System slowdown:
Ease of use: Superior    False-positive detections

这几个选项我觉得值得关注，综合病毒侦测率，主动防御保护，系统迟滞，易用性……  Norton之所以这么靠前个人认为，一方面可能样本是立足于美国就是Symantec的总部了，其收集肯定不错；另一方面呢，我们看2007版的家庭个人版Norton正如其表面已经有了很大的改善，无论是其资源占用，还是病毒侦测，都有了很大的进步，曾经有的人说Norton是昔日的王者，可惜不思进取，但现在我想至少可以证明其不是这样。   BD对系统的拖累，我们可以看到了……但令我奇怪的是，很多评测都是说熊猫很占资源，我用的时候感觉也是如此，为什么评测却说它不是……?????? Nod32虽然这次分数仍是很高，但确实反映了其不足，虽然在VB100%可以叱咤风云，在此地就未必是第一喔…… 还有更多的等大家发掘并探讨了。
一次好的测试值得我们仔细玩味，探讨，提出问题，解决问题，不只是看过飘过而已……（个人愚见……）

Antivirus Software
	1	Kaspersky Anti-Virus 6 • Download price when reviewed: $50 ($35 renewal) • Malware detection rate: 96% • Proactive detection: 51% • System slowdown: 10% • Ease of use: Superior • False-positive detections: 6 Check latest prices This effective but expensive program has solid malware detection and the fastest outbreak-response time among currently tested competitors. (Last Rated: April 23, 2007) Full Review • Test Report
	2	Symantec Norton AntiVirus 2007 • Download price when reviewed: $40 ($39 renewal) • Malware detection rate: 96% • Proactive detection: 49% • System slowdown: 10% • Ease of use: Superior • False-positive detections: 3 Check latest prices Symantec's solid program wins top marks for antivirus detection and cleanup, but its renewal and support costs are high. (Last Rated: April 23, 2007) Full Review • Test Report
	3	BitDefender Antivirus 10 • Download price when reviewed: $30 ($22 renewal) • Malware detection rate: 96% • Proactive detection: 61% • System slowdown: 124% • Ease of use: Superior • False-positive detections: 14 Check latest prices BitDefender has excellent malware detection and a good price, but it's hamstrung by a noticeable (though not show-stopping) system slowdown. (Last Rated: April 23, 2007) Full Review • Test Report
	4	Eset NOD32 • Download price when reviewed: $39 ($27 renewal) • Malware detection rate: 90% • Proactive detection: 79% • System slowdown: 5% • Ease of use: Very Good • False-positive detections: 6 Check latest prices NOD32 has the best proactive protection by far, but its overall malware detection is second-tier, and it has an overly technical interface. (Last Rated: April 23, 2007) Full Review • Test Report
	5	Panda Antivirus 2007 • Download price when reviewed: $30 ($30 renewal) • Malware detection rate: 90% • Proactive detection: 56% • System slowdown: 4% • Ease of use: Very Good • False-positive detections: 3 Check latest prices This competitively priced option provides good proactive protection, average overall malware detection, and a poor disinfection rate. (Last Rated: April 23, 2007) Full Review • Test Report
	6	Alwil Avast 4 Antivirus Professional Edition • Download price when reviewed: $40 ($28 renewal) • Malware detection rate: 92% • Proactive detection: 37% • System slowdown: 4% • Ease of use: Good • False-positive detections: 5 Check latest prices This program has decent overall malware detection, but poor proactive protection and an awkward interface. It also lacks U.S. phone support. (Last Rated: April 23, 2007) Full Review • Test Report
	7	Grisoft AVG 7.5 Anti-Virus Professional • Download price when reviewed: $30 ($15 renewal) • Malware detection rate: 91% • Proactive detection: 34% • System slowdown: 2% • Ease of use: Good • False-positive detections: 1 Vendor's Web Site The least-expensive program we tested, AVG has average overall malware detection, the worst proactive protection, and a clunky interface. (Last Rated: April 23, 2007) Full Review • Test Report
	8	Trend Micro AntiVirus plus AntiSpyware 2007 • Download price when reviewed: $40 ($40 renewal) • Malware detection rate: 82% • Proactive detection: 43% • System slowdown: 9% • Ease of use: Very Good • False-positive detections: 0 Check latest prices Trend Micro's poor performance at detecting malicious software (overall and proactive) put it at the bottom of the barrel in our ranking. (Last Rated: April 23, 2007) Full Review • Test Report

[ 本帖最后由 piratk 于 2007-5-11 15:30 编辑 ]

The EQs

偶认为对nod32的测试还是比较准确的。。。正好反应了nod32的不足

norton的检出率这么高？？？

It also lacks U.S. phone support.
。。。。看看对avast的评价，从此句可以鉴定，该网站的测试带有“美国主观性”，鉴定完毕

piratk

原帖由 aprilfoolphoeny 于 2007-5-8 22:29 发表
It also lacks U.S. phone support.
。。。。看看对avast的评价，从此句可以鉴定，该网站的测试带有“美国主观性”，鉴定完毕

呵呵，当然了 PC 杂志本来就是啊……

木棉花开

6334981

还比较客观

tracydk

比较正常

bojinov

基本符合我心中对这些杀软的观感

yym1988520

我自已用   趋势科技 和赛门铁克的诺顿