为了满足版规要求的原创性，本首席只好用英文把原贴重写一遍，并尽量凑够700词。不知道这样是否能满足某些网友对原创的严格要求？
Summary of the Thoughts on "False Positives"
Problems originated from the chief to write a small tool (cloud killing the client gadgets, http://bbs.kafan.cn/thread-944466-6-1.html), the chief use of this gadget made of VT some tests (VT false positive test, http://bbs.kafan.cn/thread-948390-1-1.html), and the test area to increase the false positive test proposed recommendations ([recommend comments] proposed increase in this edition false positive test content "http://bbs.kafan.cn/thread-948687-1-1.html).
But it seems that many students do not know much of the problem of false positives.
First, we should see:
1, does not consider false positives, 100% killing rate is very easy to implement;
2, small improvements false alarm rate, can lead to substantially reduce the rate of killing;
For the first argument: does not consider false positives, 100% killing rate is very easy to implement; the chief give a simple example:
Suppose card virus samples of rice bags, 100 sample documents, including 80 normal files, 20 virus files.
Anti-virus companies can achieve a rule of killing 100%, for example, "who are card rice samples of the virus package, are viruses."
Is not that simple, 100% of the killing rate.
For the second point: the false positive rate of small improvements, will lead to substantially reduce the rate of killing;
Something slightly more complicated example:
Suppose card virus samples of rice bags, 100 sample documents, including 80 normal files, 20 virus files. 10 of them the virus file is a regular PE format, 10 virus files are RAR package;
Taking into account the false positive, anti-virus vendors to change the rules to "all belong to the regular card, PE bag rice virus format, are the virus."
This time, click on the killing rate from 100% to 50%.
So here is given of the chief conclusions:
Without considering the case of false positives, simply visit a killing rate of anti-virus product is meaningless.
How to deal with the problem of false positives can be investigated from two angles:
1, from a user perspective, whether there is enough tolerance. In contrast, the domestic users than users of the foreign high tolerance; free user tolerance for paying customers than high.
2, from the firm's perspective, false positive tests is more of a commercial quality anti-virus vendors. Manufacturers may have been irresponsible to promote a high-profile killing rate of false positives indifferent. Responsible manufacturers may consider the user's experience, to bear false positive result in reducing the killing rate of the relatively low ranking pressure.
The Chief of the original post, even by some users do not belong to the original question, and has indeed been turned into a discussion of management personnel. Let the chief is really ridiculous.
A point, there are identified cases, and expansion, a conclusion, fully self-contained one complete original post, renamed the discussion of what? Written discussion of the chief good or bad? Comment on any post will be some people are into the discussion?
Today, intended to take the chief of a Pa Pa Playin the original provisions to the chief mastery of the seven or eight countries in English, 700 English words is again a summary of the chief, then a translator in a floor scale, nature makes those distorts the original provisions of the students to shut up. This is really boring.
The chief did not want to waste time on the original problem, but the chief of the new posts (On "computer virus Undecidability", http://bbs.kafan.cn/thread-952836-1-1.html), actually was again changed managers from the original share. Let the spirit of the most respected of the original principal feel then?
Let's review what the students to forward the original paste hsgeorge standards. The chief's post Putting aside to meet all the conditions, we take a look at this one:
"● Translation of 700 words (or more) of the technical content";
After reading this for a long time to find his chief Daya. Other things, take over the Chinese repeat, it becomes the original? You let people author feel then? Translation to indicate a translation, which is helpful for the dissemination of knowledge to contribute. Translated into the original scale, that is 100% plagiarism.
Playin in the rules for interpretation crooked friends, with no consideration to change the classification of the administrator, is not the cause of rare original cards main meal?
To meet the requirements of the original version of regulation, the chief had to stick with a rewrite of the original English, and lobbied as 700 words. Do not know whether it can meet certain stringent requirements of users on the original? |
楼主: nkspark
[复制链接]
发表于 2011-4-4 11:18:21
楼主
