查看: 12003|回复: 84
收起左侧

[资讯] AV-C关于赛门铁克为何不在2012年测试名单的说明公布!!!

  [复制链接]
guidanba
发表于 2012-3-7 12:33:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
Participants 2012We are happy to annouce the participants of our annual public test-series of 2012:

International participants:

AhnLab (NEW), Avast, AVG, AVIRA, Bitdefender, Bullguard (NEW),
eScan, ESET, Fortinet (NEW), F-Secure, G DATA, GFI (NEW),
Kaspersky, McAfee, Microsoft, Panda, PC Tools, Sophos, Trend Micro, Webroot.

Chinese participants:

360 Qihoo, QQ Tencent

--------------------------------

AV-Comparatives regret to announce that Symantec Norton have decided not to enter its security product in the AV-Comparatives test series for 2012.



In order to ensure that our test results give a complete and accurate picture of a product’s capabilities, AV-Comparatives has strict rules about which tests every product must take part in, and which tests are optional. This is to ensure that the aggregated results best reflect the actual protection the tested products provide to their customers.



As Symantec Norton declined to participate in the File Detection Test, we will unfortunately not be able to provide our readers with any test results for Symantec Norton in 2012. Symantec Norton have the option of officially returning to the tests, but only in accordance with the standard conditions, namely that results of all compulsory tests will be published.



AV-Comparatives allowed manufacturers to opt out of the Proactive Protection Test, and have also made participation in the Phishing Test optional. Whilst phishing is an important security issue, it is different from protection against malware, and not all security products include anti-phishing protection.



Symantec Norton have indicated that they do not wish to participate in the File Detection Test. AV-Comparatives, based on feedback from our users, regard this test as still being of fundamental importance in evaluating the overall effectiveness of anti-malware software, second only to the Whole Product “Real World” Protection Test (WPT). A product could score highly in the WPT by e.g. blocking known source URLs for malware code, but fail to protect adequately if the malware is already resident on the target computer or arrives through a different channel (e.g., a USB drive). Consequently, AV-Comparatives require all participating manufacturers to take the File Detection Test. If we did not, the results of the other tests might give a misleading picture as to the overall protection offered by a product.



Should you wish to express your opinion to Symantec Norton in this regard, AV-Comparatives will forward mails which are sent to symantecnorton2012@av-comparatives.org



Symantec Norton is always welcome ro rejoin the public annual test series af AV-Comparatives.




http://www.av-comparatives.org/f ... d&threadID=1060

评分

参与人数 1人气 +1 收起 理由
bbs2811125 + 1 版区有你更精彩: )

查看全部评分

guidanba
 楼主| 发表于 2012-3-7 12:34:24 | 显示全部楼层
这个隔了四天,发现的有点迟了,给大家抱歉啊。
xilinfeng2008
发表于 2012-3-7 12:36:45 | 显示全部楼层
真没注意,楼主心细啊
jefffire
头像被屏蔽
发表于 2012-3-7 12:40:15 | 显示全部楼层
不想参加扫描测试,嘿嘿
寒山竹语
发表于 2012-3-7 12:46:18 | 显示全部楼层
静态扫描也只是Symantec Norton众多防御中的一种。而且即使静态扫描,Symantec Norton也能说的过去。

下一个是谁呢
hilan
发表于 2012-3-7 12:49:41 | 显示全部楼层
Chinese participants中有QQ腾讯不会是管家吧
360Tencent
发表于 2012-3-7 12:49:45 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 360Tencent 于 2012-3-7 13:07 编辑

http://community.norton.com/t5/N ... /td-p/672299/page/2





Symantec has long been an advocate of independent “whole product” or “real-world” tests that most closely represent the interests of consumers and utilize all of the proactive technologies provided with a product, as opposed to “static” tests that only test an individual component.  Currently AV-Comparatives does not offer a subscription focused solely on these “whole product” or “real-world” types of tests.  At this time, Symantec has chosen not to subscribe to AV-Comparatives’ testing program for 2012.  Our philosophy is to participate in tests that have high relevance and meaning for consumers, and most accurately align with their real-world need for comprehensive protection and machine cleanup from evolving online threats.  We will continue to seek out and participate in a range of tests that meet these standards to measure our products’ efficacy and performance.


it appears Symantec feels that AV-Comparatives is placing too much focus on AV detection, not how well a suite prevents you from getting infected in the first place...

While I don't necessarily agree  detection isn't 'real world', (there are still too many physical infection vectors in 'real world' computing...) I definitely agree that too much weight is being put behind detection tests and detection 'ratings' by the security industry.

But one thing is for sure: system security is more than the detection rate of a product

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?快速注册

x
bjwong
发表于 2012-3-7 12:54:31 | 显示全部楼层
哈哈,ahnlab,QQ都有
精彩了
-oAo-
发表于 2012-3-7 13:36:50 | 显示全部楼层
好像诺顿就因为观念不同而退出了
哀酱俏佳人
发表于 2012-3-7 13:37:08 | 显示全部楼层
扫描测试觉得很鸡肋的


防御才是最实际的


block virus 才是检验杀软的最好标准
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 快速注册

本版积分规则

手机版|杀毒软件|软件论坛| 卡饭论坛

Copyright © KaFan  KaFan.cn All Rights Reserved.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4( 沪ICP备2020031077号-2 ) GMT+8, 2024-11-25 23:18 , Processed in 0.122031 second(s), 18 queries .

卡饭网所发布的一切软件、样本、工具、文章等仅限用于学习和研究,不得将上述内容用于商业或者其他非法用途,否则产生的一切后果自负,本站信息来自网络,版权争议问题与本站无关,您必须在下载后的24小时之内从您的电脑中彻底删除上述信息,如有问题请通过邮件与我们联系。

快速回复 客服 返回顶部 返回列表