matousec防泄漏测试最新报告出炉，瑞星垫底

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2012-4-26 06:06:56

除了毛豆都很可怜

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2012-4-26 08:28:52

ywsuda 发表于 2012-2-21 07:58 好假，卡巴呢，诺顿和bd都掉在eset和avast后面了

卡巴防火墙在64位下没有任何效果

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2012-4-26 10:30:32

ywsuda 发表于 2012-2-21 07:58
好假，卡巴呢，诺顿和bd都掉在eset和avast后面了

是防泄露又不是杀毒

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2012-4-26 10:33:36

很正常 matousec 的测试主防和反泄漏方面的得分是占非常多的，防火墙占少部分。
如果前几名全都没有主防，成绩也会靠后了
而瑞星防火墙部分没什么改进，功能上也没有加强，主防更没有，得到这样的成绩很正常。

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2012-4-26 11:36:39

诺顿很有个性的说

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2012-4-26 11:55:55

驴肉火烧发表于 2012-4-25 20:15
我想问下这测试毛豆用的是默认规则吗

The products are configured to their highest usable security settings and tested with this configuration only. We define the highest security settings as settings that the user is able to set without advanced knowledge of the operating system. This means that the user, with the skills and knowledge we assume, is able to go through all forms of the graphic user interface of the product and enable or disable or choose among several therein given options, but is not able to think out names of devices, directories, files, registry entries etc. to add to some table of protected objects manually, not even if such a configuration is suggested on the product's support forum or website.

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2012-4-26 11:58:21

这么娱乐的测试还有人在看……

显示全部楼层 · 发表于 2012-4-26 12:08:46

帅就是帅发表于 2012-4-26 11:55

看这意思好像没有添加规则？只是在D+设置和防火墙设置里有所调整

[分享] matousec防泄漏测试最新报告出炉，瑞星垫底