你真的认为wildlist病毒库中的中国的病毒少？

mofunzone

原帖由 solcroft 于 2007-2-3 12:01 发表

中国根本就没有什么技术高明的反毒公司，照你说来，这样中国有什么鬼样本都不用报告WildList了，没人够资格来打报告。

你以为symantec很高明吗？
提取特征码这种技术是个人就可以做，只要有软件
symantec出名也是因为企业，我想我很清楚的解释了企业防病毒和个人用户所需要的反病毒之间的区别了
在个人领域上，symantec的技术相对其他产品来说没有任何优势，因为个人反病毒不需要所谓的部署和协调能力
包括你自己在内，都没有选择使用symantec的产品，说明了一个什么问题呢？

The EQs

原帖由 mofunzone 于 2007-2-4 05:12 发表

你以为symantec很高明吗？
提取特征码这种技术是个人就可以做，只要有软件
symantec出名也是因为企业，我想我很清楚的解释了企业防病毒和个人用户所需要的反病毒之间的区别了
在个人领域上，symantec的技术 ...

赛门铁克的理念很适合企业用户。。。。但是不适合家庭用户。。。如果你知道他在全球企业用户当中是老大就知道了。。。。

mofunzone

原帖由 EQ2 于 2007-2-3 13:11 发表

搞笑？？？
VB100 Results Overview: Avirahttp://www.virusbtn.com/images/bgraph.gifhttp://www.virusbtn.com/images/ggraph.gifhttp://www.virusbtn.com/images/bgraph.gifhttp://www.virusbtn.com/image ...

貌似nod没有fail过似的

mofunzone

原帖由 EQ2 于 2007-2-3 13:13 发表

赛门铁克的理念很适合企业用户。。。。但是不适合家庭用户。。。如果你知道他在全球企业用户当中是老大就知道了。。。。

对呀
你自己都承认了，那么symantec在vb100取得pass的成绩更加对于我们个人用户来说无效了
你又自己证明了这个观点

The EQs

原帖由 mofunzone 于 2007-2-4 05:14 发表

貌似nod没有fail过似的

VB100 Results Overview: Eset42 Success / 3 Failure / 5 No Entry
Vendor websitehttp://www.nod32.com
Test historyFebruary 2007 - ESET NOD32 antivirus system 2.7

Status: PASS Product name: ESET NOD32 antivirus system 2.7 More: February 2007 in full Review: ESET NOD32 antivirus system 2.7 on Windows Vista

December 2006 - ESET NOD32 v.2.5

Status: PASS Product name: ESET NOD32 v.2.5 More: December 2006 in full Review: ESET NOD32 v.2.5 on Windows XP x64 Edition

October 2006 - Eset NOD32 2.5

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 2.5 More: October 2006 in full Review: Eset NOD32 2.5 on Windows 2000 Server

August 2006 - Eset NOD32 1.1640

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 1.1640 More: August 2006 in full Review: Eset NOD32 1.1640 on Netware 6.5

June 2006 - Eset NOD32

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 More: June 2006 in full Review: Eset NOD32 on Windows XP

April 2006 - Eset NOD32 2.51.2

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 2.51.2 More: April 2006 in full Review: Eset NOD32 2.51.2 on Red Hat Linux 9

February 2006 - Eset NOD32 1.1358

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 1.1358 More: February 2006 in full Review: Eset NOD32 1.1358 on Windows NT 4.0 Workstation

December 2005 - ESET NOD32 1.1268(20051031)

Status: PASS Product name: ESET NOD32 1.1268(20051031) More: December 2005 in full Review: ESET NOD32 1.1268(20051031) on Windows Server 2003 Enterprise X64 version

October 2005 - Eset NOD32 1.1207

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 1.1207 More: October 2005 in full Review: Eset NOD32 1.1207 on Windows Server 2003

August 2005 - Eset NOD32 1.11.61

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 1.11.61 More: August 2005 in full Review: Eset NOD32 1.11.61 on Netware 6.5

June 2005 - Eset NOD32 1.1087

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 1.1087 More: June 2005 in full Review: Eset NOD32 1.1087 on Windows XP

April 2005 - Eset NOD32 2.03

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 2.03 More: April 2005 in full

February 2005 - Eset NOD32 1.956

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 1.956 More: February 2005 in full Review: Eset NOD32 1.956 on Windows NT 4.0

November 2004 - Eset NOD32 1.889

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 1.889 More: November 2004 in full

August 2004 - Eset NOD32 1.804

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 1.804 More: August 2004 in full

June 2004 - Eset NOD32 1.753

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 1.753 More: June 2004 in full

April 2004 - Eset NOD32 2.01 1.650

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 2.01 1.650 More: April 2004 in full

February 2004 - Eset NOD32 1.595

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 1.595 More: February 2004 in full

November 2003 - Eset NOD32 v1.529

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.529 More: November 2003 in full

August 2003 - Eset NOD32 v1.455(20030707)

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.455(20030707) More: August 2003 in full

June 2003 - Eset NOD32 v1.405

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.405 More: June 2003 in full

February 2003 - Eset NOD32 v1.341

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.341 More: February 2003 in full

November 2002 - Eset NOD32 v1.314

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.314 More: November 2002 in full

August 2002 - Eset NOD32 v1.280 20020708

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.280 20020708 More: August 2002 in full

June 2002 - Eset NOD32 v1.256

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.256 More: June 2002 in full

April 2002 - Eset NOD32 v1.1990

Status: FAIL Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.1990 More: April 2002 in full

February 2002 - Eset NOD32 v1.144

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.144 More: February 2002 in full

November 2001 - Eset NOD32 v1.114

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.114 More: November 2001 in full

September 2001 - Eset NOD32 v1.99

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.99 More: September 2001 in full

April 2001 - Eset NOD32 v1.70 NT

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.70 NT More: April 2001 in full

February 2001 - Eset NOD32 v1.58

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.58 More: February 2001 in full

November 2000 - Eset NOD32 v1.47

Status: FAIL Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.47 More: November 2000 in full

September 2000 - Eset NOD32 v1.42

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.42 More: September 2000 in full

July 2000 - Eset NOD32 v1.35

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.35 More: July 2000 in full

April 2000 - Eset NOD32 v1.31

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.31 More: April 2000 in full

February 2000 - Eset NOD32 v1.27

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.27 More: February 2000 in full

November 1999 - Eset NOD32 v1.24

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.24 More: November 1999 in full

September 1999 - Eset NOD32 v1.20

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.20 More: September 1999 in full

May 1999 - Eset NOD32 v1.15

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.15 More: May 1999 in full

March 1999 - Eset NOD32 v1.13

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.13 More: March 1999 in full

January 1999 - Eset NOD32 v1.11

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.11 More: January 1999 in full

November 1998 - Eset NOD32 v1.09

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.09 More: November 1998 in full

September 1998 - Eset NOD32 v1.06

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.06 More: September 1998 in full

May 1998 - Eset NOD32 v1.00

Status: PASS Product name: Eset NOD32 v1.00 More: May 1998 in full

February 1998 - Eset NOD-iCE v7.19

Status: FAIL Product name: Eset NOD-iCE v7.19 More: February 1998 in full

只有3次失败。。。。非常难得的厂商。。。。小红伞真有这个实力超过nod32？？偶看未必吧。。。很多口碑比nod32好N多的欧美厂商都没有这个实力。。。。

mofunzone

原帖由 EQ2 于 2007-2-3 13:17 发表

VB100 Results Overview: Esethttp://www.virusbtn.com/images/bgraph.gifhttp://www.virusbtn.com/images/ggraph.gifhttp://www.virusbtn.com/images/bgraph.gifhttp://www.virusbtn.com/images/rgraph.gifh ...

你自己已经充分的证明了vb100的成绩根本就没用
而你自己还在用vb100的成绩来说nod好用
还有什么疑问吗？
完全无效的证据

The EQs

原帖由 mofunzone 于 2007-2-4 05:15 发表

对呀
你自己都承认了，那么symantec在vb100取得pass的成绩更加对于我们个人用户来说无效了
你又自己证明了这个观点

无效？？对于很多追求稳定的人依然有效。。。看看赛门铁克和微软的关系就能证明了。。。再看看Avira和微软的关系

The EQs

原帖由 mofunzone 于 2007-2-4 05:18 发表

你自己已经充分的证明了vb100的成绩根本就没用
而你自己还在用vb100的成绩来说nod好用
还有什么疑问吗？
完全无效的证据

没用？？？？赛门铁克的测试对于追求稳定的人来说参考价值很高。。在国内外，很多人都是追求稳定。。so赛门铁克在 VB的表现更加适合他们。。。。。

mofunzone

原帖由 EQ2 于 2007-2-3 13:18 发表

   无效？？对于很多追求稳定的人依然有效。。。看看赛门铁克和微软的关系就能证明了。。。再看看Avira和微软的关系

那么我问你，你很追求稳定吗？
上个帖子中，你自己证明了vb结果对中国用户无参考价值
这个帖子，你自己又证明了vb结果对个人用户无参考价值
就这两点来看
个人国内用户已经完全可以无视vb的成绩了
而且你这么追求稳定，我倒是希望你可以使用symantec的产品，以说明你对稳定的要求

The EQs

原帖由 mofunzone 于 2007-2-4 05:22 发表

那么我问你，你很追求稳定吗？
上个帖子中，你自己证明了vb结果对中国用户无参考价值
这个帖子，你自己又证明了vb结果对个人用户无参考价值
就这两点来看
个人国内用户已经完全可以无视vb的成绩了
而且你 ...

偶不是喜欢经常隔离的人。。。但是身边有很多人喜欢。。。。自己证明了？？？继续按照你的推论说下去就是wildlist的病毒库中有很多国外厂商都提供了中国的木马。。。那么vb的测试能说明一切问题。。。。